06.06.2013 Views

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Choosing Investment Portfolios When the Returns<br />

Have Stable Distributions* st<br />

W. T. Ziemba<br />

THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA<br />

This paper presents an efficient method for computing approximately<br />

optimal portfolios when the returns have symmetric stable distributions and<br />

there are many alternative investments. The procedure is valid, in particular,<br />

for independent investments and for multivariate investments of the classes<br />

introduced by Press and Samuelson. The algorithm is based on a two-stage<br />

decomposition of the problem and is analogous to the procedure developed<br />

by the author that is available for normally distributed investments utilizing<br />

Lintner's reformulation of Tobin's separation theorem.<br />

A tradeoff analysis between mean (/i) and dispersion (d) is valid since an<br />

investment choice maximizes expected utility if and only if it lies on a \i-d<br />

efficient curve. When a risk-free asset is available one may find the efficient<br />

curve, which is a ray in fi-d space, by solving a fractional program. The<br />

fractional program always has a pseudo-concave objective function and hence<br />

may be solved by standard nonlinear programming algorithms. Its solution,<br />

which is generally unique, provides optimal proportions for the risky assets<br />

that are independent of the unspecified concave utility function. One must<br />

then choose optimal proportions between the risk-free asset and a risky<br />

composite asset utilizing a given utility function. The composite asset is stable<br />

and consists of a sum of the random investments weighted by the optimal<br />

proportions. This problem is a stochastic program having one random variable<br />

and one decision variable. Symmetric stable distributions have known closedform<br />

densities only when a, the characteristic exponent, is \ (the arc sine),<br />

1 (the Cauchy), or 2 (the normal). Hence, there is no apparent algorithm that<br />

will solve the stochastic program for general 1 < a < 2. However, one may<br />

obtain a reasonably accurate approximate solution to this program utilizing<br />

tables recently compiled by Fama and Roll. Standard nonlinear programming<br />

* Presented by invitation at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Mathematical<br />

Programming in Theory and Practice, Figueira da Foz, Portugal, June 12-23, 1972. This<br />

research was partially supported by the National Research Council of Canada Grant<br />

NRC-A7-7147, the Samuel Bronfman Foundation, The Graduate School of Business,<br />

Stanford University, and Atomic Energy Commission, Grant AT 04-3-326-PA #18.<br />

t Reprinted from Mathematical Programming in Theory and Practice, P. L. Hammer and<br />

G. Zoutendijk, eds. North-Holland Publishing Company, 1974.<br />

1. MEAN-VARIANCE AND SAFETY-FIRST APPROACHES 243

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!