06.06.2013 Views

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

596 NILS H. HAKANSSON<br />

The proof is immediate from the observation that u(c) is monotone increasing<br />

and that r, {/}f}, and the feasible tif are bounded.<br />

We are now ready to prove the theorem. The method of proof will be to verify<br />

that (22H25) is the (only) solution to (11). 8<br />

PROOF OF THEOREM 1 FOR MODELS I-II: Denote the right side of (11) by T(x) upon<br />

inserting (22) for f(x). This gives, for all decision points ;',<br />

f 1 Y\l M<br />

(35) T(x) = max^c' + a(l - (a/cy)" 1 '-'')'-^ - Y (ft - r)zt<br />

subject to<br />

(12) c > 0,<br />

(13) Zi>Q, its,<br />

and<br />

+ r(x - c) + y + Y<br />

(14) Prj J i», ~ r)z{ + i[x - c) + y + (y/(r - 1)) > oj = 1.<br />

Since (14) may be written<br />

Pr { S (ft - r)z, + r(x + Y - c) > 0 J = 1,<br />

it follows from the "no-easy-money condition" (4) that (14) is satisfied if and only if<br />

either<br />

(36)<br />

and<br />

(37)<br />

or<br />

(38)<br />

and<br />

(39)<br />

s - c = 0<br />

zf = 0<br />

s - c > 0<br />

P r C u<br />

Pr {.I(ft-'-W(s-c) l(P<br />

+ r>oJ = l)<br />

where s = x + Y.<br />

Under feasibility with respect to (14), we then obtain<br />

maxUs', T{x)\, 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!