06.06.2013 Views

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MULT1PERI0D RISK PREFERENCE<br />

between consumption and an income-generating asset. He is then assumed<br />

to receive an income from sale of labor services and to realize gains or<br />

losses on his risky investment, after which he is required to make another<br />

allocation decision.<br />

It will be assumed that utilities are additive in time, and that the singleperiod<br />

functions exhibit decreasing absolute and increasing relative risk<br />

aversion; with these conditions and some additional qualifications it will<br />

be shown that the consumer's multiperiod decisions are made in a manner<br />

which exhibits both decreasing absolute and increasing relative risk<br />

aversion. Thus, sufficient conditions for single-period risk preferences to<br />

be reflected in the derived utility functions of tne sequential maximization<br />

problem will be exhibited.<br />

To proceed formally, define the problem<br />

where<br />

( N )<br />

max E £ j3 n - 1 un(a„ , bn)l subject to a„ + b„ = An ,<br />

°- b («=i ) C3-1)<br />

u,,(a„ . b„) = »„(*„);<br />

a„e[0,A„],Aa+l = k + b„,<br />

n = 1,2,..., tf- 1;<br />

"N(".\ . bN) = vN(bN) + fiwf,(k + £aN);<br />

v„( ) = utility of consumption in period 5 n;<br />

b„ = dollar value of consumption in period n\<br />

? W N{ ) = beginning-period utility of wealth 6 possessed at end of<br />

period .V;<br />

k = nonnegative cash income during each period 7 ;<br />

a„ = amount of wealth invested in period n\<br />

'" Economists differ concerning the importance of assuming these functions to be<br />

bounded. Reference [2] discusses the types of paradox which can arise if functions are<br />

not bounded; Ref. [13] maintains that qualifications respecting boundedness are not<br />

of prime importance. For simplicity we.omit the boundedness assumption.<br />

6 Wealth is assumed to have utility at the problem's horizon because the individual<br />

is supposed to regard it either as a bequest (which provides him satisfaction) or as a<br />

proxy for consumption at points in time beyond those included in his planning problem.<br />

The need for (and desirability of) including the bequest motive disappears in infinitehorizon<br />

formulations of the problem. For discussions of this point, see Refs. [3, 8, 131.<br />

7 It is assumed that transactions between cash and the risky asset are costless; hence,<br />

it becomes unnecessary to distinguish between the forms in which wealth may be held<br />

at the beginning of any period.<br />

506 PART V. DYNAMIC MODELS<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!