06.06.2013 Views

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

292 REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES<br />

In addition to (1.4) we have<br />

Combining (1.4) and (1.5) we obtain<br />

where<br />

y = f+ o, = r"+6ar<br />

B =<br />

°,<br />

Equations (1.5) and (1.6) can be represented as in Figure 3<br />

1 *<br />

U V U 2 U3IU/O.6)<br />

FIGURE 3<br />

(1.6a)<br />

• •<br />

...(1.5)<br />

...(1.6)<br />

Ul>U2>U3> t/4 indicate utility indifference curves. The point A is first determined<br />

and then the degree of lending/borrowing w is selected.<br />

If we introduce a proportional tax, (1.5) will take the form<br />

and (1.6) will take the form<br />

(7y = w(i-t)ar,<br />

y = r*(l-l)+Z^lay.<br />

...(1.5a)<br />

...(1.6a)<br />

These two curves are drawn with dotted lines in Figure 3. Thus we see that (1.6)<br />

moves down to the position (1.6a) and (1.5) swings to position (1.5a). The effects of the<br />

first factor is indicated by the difference between A and A 1 and the second effect by the<br />

difference B—B l . Increased w means greater risk-taking. Whether w increases or not<br />

depends upon the size of these two effects. It seems that borrowing, i.e. operating to the<br />

right of T implies a move towards greater risk-taking since the effects there are much<br />

greater on the difference between (1.5a) and (1.5).<br />

A somewhat different approach to the investment problem under risk is given in<br />

Roy [17]. He assumes that the investor makes investments in order to minimize the upper<br />

316 PART III. STATIC PORTFOLIO SELECTION MODELS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!