06.06.2013 Views

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(c) the p' are independent, and<br />

(d) the p' have discrete distributions.<br />

(e) Attempt to develop a result similar to that in the proposition in the Appendix that<br />

describes a simple optimal policy for case (d).<br />

13. The proofs of Corollaries 1 and 2 of Theorem 1 in the Kalymon paper implicitly<br />

assume that xt remains constant in an optimal policy. Prove rigorously that this is true.<br />

14. (Elementary properties of renewal processes) Let {X„,n = 1,2,...} be a sequence<br />

of nonnegative iid random variables with distribution F, such that P[X„ = G] < 1. Let<br />

ft = EX„ (which exists, but may be oo). Define S0 = 0, Sa = lZ"=iXj, n £ 1, and define<br />

N(t) = sup{n|5„g/}. The stochastic process (N(t), (^0} is called a renewal process.<br />

Intuitively, the X„ are "interarrival times" of some probabilistic process, and N(t) is the<br />

number of "arrivals" in [0,/].<br />

(a) Show that SJn -+ p. w.p. 1 as n -> oo, and N(t) < oo w.p. 1. [Hint: Use the strong<br />

law of large numbers.]<br />

(b) Show that lim,.,*, N{t)/t = 1/// w.p. 1. {Hint: Show that SNm g t g SNm+u and<br />

Af(/)-> oo w.p. 1 as t-* oo.]<br />

Suppose that a reward is earned by the renewal process. Let Y(t) be the total reward earned<br />

by time t, and Y„ the incremental reward earned at the nth renewal. Assume that EX„ and<br />

E\Y„\ are finite, and that the pairs (X„,Y„) are iid. Assume temporarily that Y„ £ 0 and<br />

Y(t) S: 0 is nondecreasing in r.<br />

(c) Show that<br />

£ YJt -> EYJEXt w.p. 1 as / -> oo.<br />

[Hint: YJt = YJN(t) • N(t)jt, and use the strong law of large numbers.]<br />

(d) Show that YNm + y\t -> 0 w.p. 1 as / -> oo.<br />

(e) Show that Y(t)\t -> EYJEXi w.p. 1 as t -* oo.<br />

(f) Prove (e) when the Yn and Y(t) are not restricted in sign.<br />

Properties (e) and (f) will play a fundamental role in the investigation of time averages for<br />

Markov chains in a later exercise. Under the conditions stated above, it is true that (e) and<br />

(f) also hold in the expected value sense: EY(t)/t-* EY1IEXl as t-* oo. The proof of the<br />

latter statement requires the use of more detailed, technical properties of renewal processes<br />

[see Ross (1970)].<br />

A simple but important generalization of the results above pertains to delayed renewal<br />

processes. Let {Xn, n — 1,2,...} be nonnegative independent random variables such that Xi<br />

has distribution G and X2,X3,... have the common distribution F, EX2 = p. Let<br />

So = 0, S„ = 2 Xk, n & 1, and ND(t) = sup{«|5„ g t).<br />

k-l<br />

The process {ND(t), t jg 0} is a delayed renewal process.<br />

(g) Show that ND(t)/t -+ \\p w.p. 1 as / -> oo.<br />

(h) Formulate and prove results similar to (e) and (f) for delayed renewal processes.<br />

15. (Properties of finite Markov chains) Let {X„, « = 0,1,...} be a stationary Markov<br />

chain with finitely many states i=l,2,...,k and stationary one-step transition matrix<br />

690<br />

PART V DYANMIC MODELS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!