27.06.2013 Views

Challenges and Opportunities for Innovation in the Public Works ...

Challenges and Opportunities for Innovation in the Public Works ...

Challenges and Opportunities for Innovation in the Public Works ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Risk <strong>and</strong> Liability<br />

"Legal Problems with <strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Works</strong>," by CF. Seemann<br />

Seemann starts his paper by describ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> historic trend <strong>in</strong> facility construction that moved <strong>the</strong><br />

responsibility of construction from a s<strong>in</strong>gle design-builder (master builder) to a team of participants<br />

contractually related to <strong>the</strong> owner. He also mentions <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> social value <strong>for</strong> human life. These<br />

two factors have contributed to an added legal responsibility <strong>for</strong> contractors, designers, <strong>and</strong> owners.<br />

<strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>in</strong> facility acquisition implies risk due to this legal responsibility <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> probability of<br />

failure. Seemann argues that <strong>in</strong> spite of <strong>the</strong> risks <strong>in</strong>volved, construction contractors can still derive profit<br />

from <strong>in</strong>novations. However, he asserts that designers are not motivated to <strong>in</strong>novate, due to lack of reward<br />

(low fees <strong>in</strong> competitive market), desire to stay <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>stream to avoid liability <strong>in</strong> case of failure, <strong>and</strong><br />

unwill<strong>in</strong>gness by owners to motivate <strong>in</strong>novation.<br />

He proposes a more active role by <strong>the</strong> Federal Government to promote <strong>in</strong>novation. This can be<br />

accomplished through <strong>the</strong> assumption of risk by <strong>the</strong> government <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>novative projects <strong>and</strong> by develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

flexible st<strong>and</strong>ards to accommodate design <strong>in</strong>novations.<br />

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>and</strong> Private Partnership<br />

"Implementation of <strong>Innovation</strong> Through Total Quality Management," by J.A. Broaddus<br />

The ultimate goal of R&D activities is <strong>the</strong> transfer of technology. Broaddus describes <strong>the</strong><br />

Construction Industry Institute (CII) <strong>and</strong> its total quality management (TQM) approach to overcom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

barriers that oppose technology transfer. TQM <strong>in</strong>volves customer focus, emphasis on processes,<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous improvement of <strong>the</strong>se processes through <strong>in</strong>novation, <strong>and</strong> people <strong>in</strong>volvement.<br />

CII is ano<strong>the</strong>r example of successful partnership between private <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>and</strong> academia. It also<br />

<strong>in</strong>volves a few public entities. The emphasis is to have products delivered to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry partners. To<br />

accomplish this, CII has used action teams con<strong>for</strong>med by <strong>in</strong>dustry participants to promote implementation<br />

of R&D products; educational programs that translate R&D results <strong>in</strong>to course programs <strong>for</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of<br />

construction personnel; <strong>and</strong> a consistent approach of mak<strong>in</strong>g implementation "company-friendly."<br />

"<strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>and</strong> Technology Transfer <strong>Opportunities</strong>: Industry/ University/ Government Partnerships," by<br />

W. Michalerya<br />

Michalerya illustrates <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>for</strong> partnerships among <strong>in</strong>dustry, academia, <strong>and</strong> Government to<br />

develop R&D <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> public works <strong>in</strong>frastructure. The Center <strong>for</strong> Advanced Technology <strong>for</strong> Large<br />

Structural Systems (ATLSS) at Lehigh University is supported by <strong>the</strong> National Science Foundation <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry partners. This <strong>in</strong>dustry partnership is valuable not only <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g of projects but also <strong>in</strong><br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g timely feedback from potential users of R&D products.<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />

"Infrastructure F<strong>in</strong>ance: <strong>the</strong> State <strong>and</strong> Local Perspectives," by B. Mays<br />

Mays discusses <strong>the</strong> trend <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure spend<strong>in</strong>g by <strong>the</strong> Federal Government,<br />

which places <strong>in</strong>creased burden on State <strong>and</strong> especially on local governments. There are several<br />

251

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!