19.07.2013 Views

A House with Two Rooms - The Advocates for Human Rights

A House with Two Rooms - The Advocates for Human Rights

A House with Two Rooms - The Advocates for Human Rights

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

d. Asylum from Persecution<br />

<strong>The</strong> political and legal reality is that states generally have not undertaken, and<br />

<strong>for</strong>eseeably will not undertake, an obligation to grant asylum in the sense of a<br />

lasting solution. <strong>The</strong> peremptory norm of non-refoulement secures admission and, in<br />

the individual case, may further raise the presumption that a local durable solution<br />

will be <strong>for</strong>thcoming. In the case of large-scale movements, however, no such<br />

presumption is raised. 30<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept of asylum relates more to the rights and duties of states – both to grant asylum and<br />

to respect asylum that is granted by another sovereign state – rather than to the right of individual<br />

refugees seeking protection. States have not accepted an international obligation to grant asylum<br />

to refugees 31 and the 1951 Refugee Convention does not include the affirmative right to asylum. 32<br />

Ef<strong>for</strong>ts to recognize a right to asylum in treaty largely have stalled since the adoption of the<br />

Declaration on Territorial Asylum in 1967 and the U.N. Conference on Territorial Asylum convened<br />

a decade later.<br />

Under the OAU Refugee Convention, states “shall use their best endeavours consistent <strong>with</strong> their<br />

respective legislations to receive refugees and to secure the settlement of those refugees who, <strong>for</strong><br />

well-founded reasons, are unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin or nationality.” 33<br />

A State Party thus must both accept a refugee <strong>with</strong>in its borders and find a longer-term solution <strong>for</strong><br />

settlement. This obligation is tempered in three ways. First, a state is obligated to provide harbor only<br />

to the extent that they are capable. Second, such harbor need only be provided to the extent that<br />

domestic legislation does not dictate otherwise. Third, a state is not obligated to provide longer-term<br />

harbor itself: it need only receive the refugee, but then may find a durable solution <strong>for</strong> the individual<br />

in a second state.<br />

<strong>The</strong> right to asylum is also upheld in the African Charter. 34 Under Article 12(3) of the Charter:<br />

“Every individual shall have the right, when persecuted, to seek and obtain asylum in other countries<br />

in accordance <strong>with</strong> laws of those countries and international conventions.” <strong>The</strong> right contained<br />

<strong>with</strong>in Article 12(3) also should be read <strong>with</strong>in the context of a State Party’s other treaty-based<br />

obligations. However, unlike <strong>with</strong>in the OAU Refugee Convention, the African Charter does not<br />

limit an individual’s right to asylum by a state’s capacity to provide safe harbor.<br />

While the United States does provide that any person who is physically present in the United<br />

States or who arrives in the United States may apply <strong>for</strong> asylum, 35 whether to grant asylum remains<br />

discretionary and numerous exceptions to asylum eligibility exist. 36<br />

556

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!