08.08.2013 Views

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

traditional and strong western influences; the economic environment characterised by a<br />

layered structure <strong>of</strong> well-to-do, poor and very poor, and the psychological environment<br />

which is abstract and extremely difficult to define, but which influences the actions and<br />

decisions <strong>of</strong>every individual. One cannot only try to improve the physical environment by,<br />

for example, building houses and providing pOluhk water. This was the wisdom in the past,<br />

as ifthe better physical environment would bring dignity and happiness to the people.<br />

We know better that development relates not only to the development <strong>of</strong>things, but <strong>of</strong>people<br />

and communities. Tendler (1982: I) describes this new-found insight as follows:<br />

'Whereas it had been previously assumed that the poor would benefit<br />

along with everyone else from roads, hydro-electric plants, exports and<br />

irrigation projects, it is now believed by many that poverty can be<br />

alleviated only if some development projects are 'targeted' directly on<br />

the poor. If the human being does not benefit from development, no<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> infrastructural or physical development will really free<br />

anyone from the poverty trap.' [www.miLeduldusp/idg/people/facultv/<br />

jtendler-ev.pdf, (2008)].<br />

In support <strong>of</strong> Tendler's (1982) assertion cited above, this situational and land use study <strong>of</strong><br />

Ulundi embraces a holistic developmental perspective that seeks to support both human<br />

development and the establishment <strong>of</strong> physical infrastructure. The study acknowledges this<br />

approach as capable <strong>of</strong> dealing with potential socio-economic extremities that may not be<br />

adequately addressed in pure market-orientated environment.<br />

3.5 THE URBAN-RURAL DICHOTOMY<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the most glaring results <strong>of</strong> centralised development decision-making is the marked<br />

rural-urban imbalance that Third World development is plagued with. Policy-makers usually<br />

underestimate the dynamics between the urban and rural set up. Questions <strong>of</strong> resource<br />

scarcity, trade-<strong>of</strong>fs between various development objectives, and the aim <strong>of</strong> efficiently<br />

meeting the needs <strong>of</strong> the greatest number <strong>of</strong> poor people come into the equation. The<br />

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!