15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Citation: Pierce v. Engle, 726 F. Supp. 1231, (1989 U.S. Dist.).<br />

Key Facts: Preston Pierce was admitted to an alcohol treatment facility on November 13,<br />

1985, and released for work on January 6, 1986. Unified School District 386 (the district)<br />

provided Pierce with 2 more weeks of rest before returning to work. This leave of absence was<br />

authorized by the board, and Pierce, principal of Grades 7-12, was paid throughout the leave.<br />

In February 986, the school exercised a reduction in force and eliminated a principal<br />

position making their school a one-principal school. This policy became official on March 17,<br />

1986. Pierce was nearing the end of his three 1-year contracts, but because of the school<br />

reorganization and Pierce’s certification status (certified administrator for Grades 7-12), the<br />

board elected to non-renew Pierce due to the district’s current economic standing and instead<br />

employ the current elementary principal as the “one-principal” because she was certified for K-<br />

12. Barbara Pierce, Preston Pierce’s wife, served as a school bus driver and concession stand<br />

worker for the school also. Following the 1985-1986 school year and the subsequent<br />

reorganization, the board reduced bus routes and chose to non-renew Pierce’s contract.<br />

Moreover, the high school shifted procedures for concessions employing students to run the<br />

concession stand. On this front, Pierce was also not offered a contract.<br />

Pierce and Pierce brought suit thereafter. Preston Pierce alleged deprivation of property<br />

and liberty interests without due process under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pierce claimed that his contract<br />

was non-renewed due to his leave of absence. He further claimed that his non-renewal was based<br />

on his status as a recovering alcoholic in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. §<br />

794). Under state law, he claimed wrongful discharge. Barbara Pierce alleged deprivation of<br />

property and liberty interests without due process under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 due to the non-renewal<br />

of both her contracts.<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!