15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

without him, but the court supported the board fully on the grounds that the safety of children<br />

outweighed Daury’s right to privacy because it related to his school ordered visits to psychiatric<br />

help in order to maintain his job.<br />

Hudson was found by another teacher straddling and choking a student who was known<br />

to be a particular problem student. In Hudson v. Wellston School District (1990 Mo. App.), the<br />

school board deemed that Hudson had violated the school’s corporal punishment policy and<br />

terminated his employment immediately. Hudson won the instant case, but the school eventually<br />

won on an error by the circuit court and Hudson’s claims of tenure were proven incorrect.<br />

Clearly, physical contact with students leads to employment actions. However, as was<br />

evidenced by Pryor, litigation can favor the administrator in such cases if the circumstances can<br />

be reasonably understood. However, the type of contact exhibited by Daury and Hudson was<br />

inexcusable and damning for their cases.<br />

Outlandish behaviors--sexual harassment and malfeasance. The largest vein of cases, 8<br />

of the 18 that were assimilated under outlandish behaviors, all dealt with sexual impropriety of<br />

some sort. Three cases were categorized as sexual malfeasance.<br />

Table 39<br />

Outlandish Behaviors--Sexual Malfeasance<br />

Case Year State Action PP<br />

Rabon v. Bryan County Bd. of Educ. 1985 GA T S<br />

Castillo v. Hobbs Municipal School Bd. 2009 NM NR S<br />

Herbert v. City of New York 2010 NY D SPLIT<br />

355

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!