15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Three other cases were split in part to the school system and the administrator, and one was<br />

remanded for rehearing.<br />

Table 21<br />

District Realignment with Litigative Claim<br />

Case Year State Action PP Litigative Claim<br />

Rossi v. Bd. of<br />

Educ. of City<br />

School Dist. of<br />

Utica<br />

In re Appeal of<br />

Cowden<br />

Cowan v. Bd. of<br />

Educ.<br />

Bell v. Bd. of<br />

Educ.<br />

Abington School<br />

Dist. v.<br />

Pacropis<br />

Mohn v. Ind.<br />

School Dist.<br />

Hatcher v. Bd.<br />

of Pub. Educ.<br />

1983 NY R E Rossi claimed that his reassignment was improper<br />

because he was not properly reinstated to a more<br />

similar position and that his salary was incorrectly<br />

adjusted following district realignment.<br />

1984 PA R E Cowden claimed that his reassignment was invalid<br />

because the board based its reduction in force<br />

decisions on performance and not seniority during<br />

district realignment.<br />

1984 NY R E Cowan claimed that his reassignment by the board<br />

was illegal because it was outside his tenure area and<br />

the board failed to return him to his tenure area when<br />

openings arose following district realignment.<br />

1984 NY R S Bell argued that his reassignment was incorrect<br />

because he was grandfathered into a tenure system<br />

that allowed him to gain tenure at a specific<br />

administrative level.<br />

1986 PA R E Pacropis argued that his reassignment to a teaching<br />

position and the district’s employment of an assistant<br />

principal with less experience was a violation of<br />

reduction in force policy during district realignment.<br />

1987 MN R S Mohn contended that the district improperly<br />

reassigned him to a teaching position because<br />

elementary administrators were not included in the<br />

district realignment during a reduction in force.<br />

1987 GA R SPLIT Hatcher was reassigned to a librarian position due to<br />

a reduction in force and district realignment. Hatcher<br />

argued that her First Amendment rights were violated<br />

because she was denied vacant administrative jobs<br />

for attending rallies to keep her school open.<br />

Daury v. Smith 1988 MA R S Daury claimed Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments<br />

retaliation violations for his reassignment during a<br />

reduction in force and district realignment due to his<br />

need for psychiatric counseling following numerous<br />

incidents of mental instability one of which included<br />

placing a student in a stranglehold.<br />

(table continues)<br />

324

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!