15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Disposition: The trial court’s ruling was affirmed.<br />

Citation: Pryor School District v. Superintendent of Public Instruction, 218 Mont. 73;<br />

707 P.2d 1094, (1985 Mont.).<br />

Key Facts: On December 14, 1982, Bruce Youngquist was confronted by the<br />

superintendent of the Pryor School District Nos. 2 and 3 (the district) about gate receipts and<br />

concession stand balances from the previous weekend’s games. That same day, Youngquist was<br />

involved in a physical altercation with a student at an assembly. The superintendent promptly set<br />

termination procedures in motion with the district board of trustees. The board immediately<br />

suspended Youngquist at the superintendent’s behest and terminated his contract at a subsequent<br />

hearing.<br />

The suspension and termination were based on four separate causes: (1) Youngquist’s<br />

insubordinate behavior and yelling obscenities at the superintendent in his meeting with the<br />

superintendent on December 14, 1982, (2) Youngquist’s lack of discretion and composure in<br />

using obscenities during a meeting with high school seniors on December 14, 1982, (3)<br />

Youngquist’s lack of discretion and composure in striking a female student with a closed fist on<br />

December 14, 1982, and (4) Youngquist’s lack of lack of discretion and composure in striking a<br />

kindergartener during the 1981-1982 school year.<br />

Youngquist requested an appeal hearing with the county level superintendent who was<br />

substituted with a neighboring county superintendent for fairness and reasonability. During the<br />

course of the hearing, each point was refuted in favor of Youngquist for either a lack of evidence<br />

or evidence that explained the situation in Youngquist’s favor. Thus, the investigating<br />

superintendent ruled that there was not sufficient cause for termination and ordered reinstatement<br />

with back pay.<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!