15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Holding: The court held that Taylor’s non-renewal was legal.<br />

Reasoning: Education Law, § 2573 provides the superintendent with final authority in<br />

granting of tenure rights to administrators. The board did hold final decision authority in non-<br />

renewal and termination proceedings, but that did not supersede the superintendent’s authority in<br />

the bestowal of tenure.<br />

1984<br />

Disposition: The order was affirmed.<br />

Citation: Philadelphia Association of School Administrators v. School District, 80 Pa.<br />

Commw. 242; 471 A.2d 581, (1984 Pa. Commw.).<br />

Key Facts: In September 1981, the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers (PFT) initiated a<br />

teachers’ strike. Philadelphia School District Superintendent, Michael P. Marcase, reassigned<br />

over 300 school administrators to report to teaching positions per their certification field for the<br />

duration of the PFT strike. Administrators who chose not to report did so under threat of<br />

suspension, demotion, and/or termination. Many of those who did report claimed that the<br />

reassignments were demotions that violated the due process protections established in 24 P.S. §<br />

11-1151. The reassigned administrators sought relief in the local court but were denied and then<br />

appealed.<br />

demotion?<br />

Issues: (1) Was the reassignment of licensed school administrators to teaching positions a<br />

Holding: The appellate court held that the public interests of continued schooling<br />

outweighed the private interests of the administrators.<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!