15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

staff, and/or parents. This was the issue in three cases. In Lomas v. Board of School Directors of<br />

Northwestern Lehigh School District (1982 Pa. Commw.), Lomas encountered significant<br />

resistance and staff division over her newly implemented reading program. Like Lomas, Terry<br />

was consumed by an incident where he publicly scolded a teacher for calling the fire department<br />

without contacting him. He then proceeded to establish an emergency response plan whereby all<br />

emergency situations had to be put before him before authorities were contacted. This was not<br />

conducive to faculty support, based on the program’s impetus and logic as it was detailed in<br />

Terry v. Woods (1992 U.S. Dist.). Lastly, in Howard v. Columbia Public School District (2004<br />

U.S. App.), Howard did not implement a new program; instead, she criticized a current special<br />

education program and sought to modify the program somewhat and received a harsh backlash<br />

from her faculty. Leaders seeking to change programs must be sure that the changes that they are<br />

attempting to make are supported by their superiors so that they may survive the followers’<br />

responses. In these three cases, the administrators lost in each one.<br />

Second, the next area that caused strife with followers was any instance where sex<br />

became an issue with the administrator and a follower in some capacity which occurred in four<br />

cases. Sex did not have to be an act; it could simply be a remark made that draws the ire of the<br />

followers. For example, in Alabama State Tenure Commission v. Phenix City Board of Education<br />

(1985 Ala. Civ. App.), Carlisle had experienced various issues during his leadership tenure, but<br />

he lost control following some sexually suggestive remarks made to a male teacher about a<br />

female teacher “wanting him.” In Spurlock v. Board of Trustees (1985 Wyo.), the history was<br />

somewhat more complex, insomuch that Spurlock made sexually inappropriate remarks to a<br />

husband-wife pair of teachers at his school. These remarks came after the husband in the pair had<br />

submitted a letter to the editor of the local newspaper criticizing Spurlock’s leadership and<br />

363

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!