15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case Year State Action PP Litigative Claim<br />

Spurlock v. Bd. of Trustees 1985 WY T SPLIT Spurlock claimed tenure violations when his administrative and teacher contracts<br />

were terminated for failed leadership and interpersonal strife due to his personal<br />

Dalton City Bd. of Educ. v.<br />

Smith<br />

Lewis v. Harrison School<br />

Dist. No. 1<br />

Abington School Dist. v.<br />

Pacropis<br />

Summers v. Vermilion<br />

Parish School Bd.<br />

threats to a husband-wife teacher pair.<br />

1986 GA NR S Smith argued that his non-renewal was carried out due to protected political<br />

activities and the action was a matter of local controversy and a First<br />

Amendment violation.<br />

1986 AR NR E Lewis claimed that the district violated his First Amendment rights by not<br />

renewing his contract for a speech at a board meeting.<br />

1986 PA R E Pacropis argued that his reassignment to a teaching position and the district’s<br />

employment of an assistant principal with less experience was a violation of<br />

reduction in force policy during district realignment.<br />

1986 LA T SPLIT Summers was arrested for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. He<br />

argued that his termination was invalid because he was not provided with a pretermination<br />

hearing violating due process.<br />

O’Dea v. School Dist. 1986 NY NR S O’Dea claimed that the school district improperly denied her tenure and that she<br />

had completed her probationary period prior to her non-renewal.<br />

Botti v. Southwest Butler 1986 PA R SPLIT Botti claimed due process violation and breach of contract twice being<br />

Co. School Dist.<br />

reassigned to teaching positions without reassignment hearings.<br />

Bell v. Bd. of Educ. 1986 MO S S Bell was suspended for failed leadership following the drowning of a student on<br />

a field trip where he was charged with negligence; Bell contended that the<br />

suspension was excessive because the mandates he failed to uphold were<br />

exceedingly vague and that the board was bound to accept the Secretary of<br />

Education’s 15 day suspension recommendation.<br />

Chambers v. Central 1987 IN T S Chambers claimed that the school board’s termination of his indefinite teacher<br />

School Dist. School Bd.<br />

contract (tenure) did not also terminate his definite administrative contract.<br />

Mohn v. Ind. School Dist. 1987 MN R S Mohn contended that the district improperly reassigned him to a teaching<br />

position because elementary administrators were not included in the district<br />

realignment during a reduction in force.<br />

Litky v. Winchester School 1987 NH NR E Litky argued that his non-renewal was illegal because he was not provided with<br />

Dist.<br />

a non-renewal hearing which violated due process protections.<br />

Walsh v. Sto-Rox School 1987 PA R S Walsh claimed that his reassignment to a high school assistant principal position<br />

Dist.<br />

was a demotion from his middle school principal position and was an illegal<br />

because he was not provided with a hearing prior to reassignment violating due<br />

process.<br />

(table continues)<br />

276

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!