15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

teacher, Flores was unable to connect the article with any official publication of the charges by<br />

the defendants.<br />

As to Flores’ property interest claims, the court sided with Boylan’s determination that<br />

Flores had failed to serve 2 years as a teacher. California Education Code § 44800 clearly states<br />

that time spent on active duty does not count toward time necessary to gain tenure. Thus, Flores<br />

failed on this argument.<br />

Flores did, however, raise an issue in regard to his property interests in his administrative<br />

position. Flores did not argue that he was tenured as an administrator as California does not<br />

provide administrative tenure but rather that his due process rights were violated. Flores’ contract<br />

specified that he could not be terminated without a conference with the superintendent prior to<br />

termination and a conference with the board to address his concerns. Flores contended that he<br />

was never given notice of the reasons his termination was being considered, and that he was not<br />

made aware that he could have legal representation at his conference with the superintendent or<br />

board. The defendants could not refute these claims as Von Kleist’s letter placing Flores on paid<br />

administrative leave did not enumerate the reasons. Flores was made aware of the reasons at his<br />

“pre-termination” conference on February 13, 2008. Thus the defendant’s motion for summary<br />

judgment on this point was denied.<br />

Moving on, Flores’ racial discrimination claim was based on Von Kleist’s references to<br />

him as “Pancho, Cisco, and Tubs (the character from Miami Vice).” Flores asserted that these<br />

racially insensitive statements were evidence that Von Kleist terminated him for his Hispanic<br />

heritage, but the Court did not agree. The Court explained that random statements by superiors<br />

do not create an inference of discrimination when legitimate reasons for termination have been<br />

proffered. The court found likewise on Flores discrimination claim based on military service.<br />

266

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!