15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It was explained earlier that the outcome of a pre-employment action meeting is less an<br />

issue in these proceedings so long as the meeting is held. Table 50 clearly highlights that<br />

administrators are far more likely to prevail in litigation where the school employer has failed to<br />

provide a pre-employment action meeting. In the cases with split decisions, the reason for the<br />

split decision was to adequately determine attorney fees. Those cases were Benson v. Bellevue<br />

School District (1985 Wash. App.), Sweeney v. Special School District (1985 Minn. App.), and<br />

Rogers v. Kelly (1989 U.S. App.).<br />

Three cases from Table 50 showed that the school systems had prevailed. The first case,<br />

Philadelphia Association of School Administrators v. School District (1984 Pa. Commw.),<br />

revolved around the claim of over three hundred administrators that they were denied a demotion<br />

hearing prior to being reassigned to teaching positions during a teacher strike. The courts deemed<br />

that to call for schools to hold a hearing for every administrator during the extenuating<br />

circumstances presented by the strike would endanger the efficient operation of the schools. In<br />

the next case, Caston School Corporation v. Phillips (1998 Ind. App.), Phillips argued that he<br />

was required to have a complete set of non-renewal hearings 1 year after the board had failed to<br />

report his non-renewal in a timely manner. Phillips had been awarded another contract and<br />

argued that he was entitled to another round of hearings. The court did not agree and held that<br />

the previous year’s hearings should have served as warning enough that his non-renewal was<br />

coming. Much like Phillips, Heutzenroeder filed suit alleging that her termination without a<br />

hearing violated her due process rights. However, the court found in Heutzenroeder v. Mesa<br />

County Valley School District 51 (2010 U.S. App.) that her acceptance of another job and failure<br />

to report to work or inform the school district bypassed her rights to a pre-termination hearing.<br />

378

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!