15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Holding: The court held that § 125.17 dictates that the principal with the least seniority<br />

should have been the first position dismissed.<br />

Reasoning: In Berland v. Special School District No. 1 (1981), the court held that the<br />

plaintiff, Berland, had to be offered an opportunity to displace a teacher of lesser seniority within<br />

the district. Therefore, if seniority was discarded when an employee moved from one position to<br />

another, few people would have an incentive to explore new job opportunities or promotions in<br />

the field of education. That is to say that McManus was entitled to the opportunity to bump an<br />

employee of lesser seniority.<br />

Disposition: The appellate court reversed the ruling.<br />

Citation: Board of Education of Alamogordo Public Schools District No. 1, v. Jennings,<br />

98 N.M. 602; 651 P.2d 1037 (1982 N.M. App.).<br />

Key Facts: Lyman Jennings was an assistant principal at Alamogordo Middle-High<br />

School. In 1979, he began an affair with a school secretary that lasted until early spring of 1980.<br />

Following the end of the affair, the secretary filed a sexual harassment claim against Jennings.<br />

Jennings appeared before the local school board for the sexual harassment claims and was fired<br />

on grounds of sexual harassment and immorality, gross inefficiency (harassment of other<br />

secretaries), and gross inefficiency (harassment had become so well-known to others that<br />

Jennings’ job effectiveness was now limited.)<br />

The state board of education reviewed Jennings’ termination and reversed the local<br />

board’s ruling based on the Alamogordo District failings in Jennings’ case. Jennings was not<br />

provided conferences to inform him of poor performance due to the sexual harassment charges.<br />

Moreover, assertions by the local board that Jennings’ job productivity had been diminished<br />

were without proof. The local board appealed this reversal.<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!