15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eassignment cases were tied to employee actions such as interpersonal strife and failed<br />

leadership on the part of the administrator. In Terry v. Woods (1992), Terry was reassigned to an<br />

elementary school from his previous position as high school principal due to his numerous<br />

conflicts with faculty and his establishment of a school policy not in accordance with school<br />

system policy. Because Terry had not acted in a manner fitting termination, he was simply<br />

reassigned. Because Terry had years remaining on his contract and could not be non-renewed, he<br />

was simply reassigned. Reassignment is a viable measure for a school system to avoid<br />

termination proceedings and to placate the faculty and parents at schools where administrators<br />

have created substantial friction and been engulfed in conflict.<br />

Tables 2-7 presented the various adverse employment actions executed by school<br />

systems. Table 3 revealed that school systems use demotion sparingly and only in cases where a<br />

school administrator has clearly not established the credibility to remain in his/her position, yet<br />

at the same time he/she has not earned a termination. Clearly, one can discern the strong parallel<br />

that exists between demotions and reassignments. Moving on, school systems, almost as<br />

sparingly, employ suspensions against school administrators as shown in Table 4. School<br />

systems did not tackle this action often because it required the school system to weigh the<br />

severity of the situation. Table 5 revealed that school systems only tackled terminations when the<br />

behaviors of the administrator were so strong that no other plan of action was available. Lastly,<br />

Tables 6 and 7 displayed the school systems’ penchant for avoiding termination proceedings by<br />

either non-renewing school administrators or reassigning them to other positions apart from their<br />

area of controversy. Clearly, school systems seek to avoid legal conflict by using non-renewal<br />

and reassignment as their primary form of employment action against school administrators.<br />

296

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!