15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Citation: Totten v. Board of Education of the County of Mingo, 171 W. Va. 755; 301<br />

S.E.2d 846, (1983 W. Va.).<br />

Key Facts: Following 15 years of service as a teacher, W. C. Totten was hired as the<br />

Kermit High School principal in 1976. Nearing the conclusion of the 1978-1979 school year,<br />

Totten set about creating a “closing bulletin,” which was a letter that was to aid the teachers in<br />

properly wrapping up all end-of-year procedures. During a June 6 faculty meeting, Totten and<br />

his faculty decided that report cards would be distributed on Friday, June 8. Totten sent a copy of<br />

the school closing bulletin to the superintendent with all applicable dates and procedures and<br />

asked for redirection if necessary.<br />

The following day, Totten was contacted the by the board superintendent who was<br />

concerned by rumors from other schools that the high school year ended on Friday. The<br />

superintendent directed Totten that Monday, June 11, and Tuesday, June 12, were both regular<br />

school days. There was no discussion of the report card issue date. On Friday, June 8, Totten<br />

made two announcements that June 11 and 12 were regular school days and attendance was<br />

expected. Report cards were also issued at the end of the day on Friday, June 8. Not surprisingly,<br />

only a small percentage of high school students attended school on the two aforementioned<br />

dates.<br />

On June 15, Totten received notification from the board that his contract was terminated<br />

effective June 30, 1979, per the superintendent’s recommendation. The same letter detailed that a<br />

meeting would be held on June 22 upon the employee’s request. At the meeting, Totten’s<br />

counsel argued that proper procedures had not been followed. The board acknowledged this and<br />

rescinded the termination vote.<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!