15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Second, Sacken (1996) and Davis (1998) revealed that the most perilous job assignment a<br />

school administrator faced was his/her own people skills. This research study thoroughly<br />

supported those notions. Within the second category, employee actions and school<br />

districts/boards identified actions that gave rise to the employment actions being litigated. The<br />

themes within the category were failed leadership, outlandish behavior, interpersonal strife, and<br />

upstanding behavior. It became clear following the study that failed leadership was inextricably<br />

tied to interpersonal strife. Insubordination, negligence, and incompetence are, at their most basic<br />

levels, behaviors evident following failed communication. The perception of a school<br />

administrator’s people skills is especially volatile due to his/her middle management position in<br />

schools. Administrators are bound to the mandates and assignments of their superiors and the<br />

school board, but they are also bound to the whims of their faculty, staff, and parent community.<br />

Therefore, it is of the utmost importance for a school administrator to find a way to balance the<br />

requirements from each side as they are bandied back and forth over the wishes from each side.<br />

Third, the research study provided a clear look at the defenses that school administrators<br />

erected in hopes of overturning adverse employment actions. The protections most cited were<br />

violations of due process, the First Amendment, tenure, and breach of contract. Due process was<br />

a consistent claim over the 30-year period and will continue to be so as long as school board’s<br />

and administrators attempt to interpret state and federal law. An interesting upswing of First<br />

Amendment litigation was also seen during the 2000s, which may be a reaction to growing<br />

accountability measures placed on administrators. As the stakes are raised, administrators feel<br />

more compelled to speak out against district decisions that they may ultimately be judged upon.<br />

Tenure was a litigated area that dissipated to only one case in the 2000s as most states have<br />

revoked tenure for administrators. Not surprisingly though, breach of contract claims grew<br />

428

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!