15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ecovering alcoholic. There were 12 total discriminatory charges as one case cited both racial<br />

and gender discrimination. In these cases, the courts found for the school system 64% of the<br />

time.<br />

Table 27<br />

Discrimination with Litigative Claim<br />

Case Year State Action PP Litigative Claim<br />

Pierce v.<br />

Engle<br />

Rogers v.<br />

Kelly<br />

Hinson v.<br />

Clinch Co.<br />

Bd. of Educ.<br />

Black v.<br />

Columbus<br />

Pub. Schools<br />

Reed v. Rolla<br />

31 Pub.<br />

School Dist.<br />

Tilghman v.<br />

Waterbury Bd.<br />

of Educ.<br />

Woods v.<br />

Enlarged City<br />

School Dist.<br />

1989 KS NR S The Pierces were a husband-wife combination that<br />

worked for the school district; both argued that their<br />

non-renewals during a reduction in force violated their<br />

due process safeguards and was based on<br />

discrimination against Mr. Pierce as recovering<br />

alcoholic.<br />

1989 AR T SPLIT Rogers alleged that his termination was motivated by<br />

racial discrimination and violated his due process<br />

protections. His termination followed a three year<br />

period where he was reassigned twice for interpersonal<br />

strife.<br />

2000 GA R E Hinson argued that her reassignment was based on<br />

gender discrimination rooted in interpersonal strife<br />

with the school board.<br />

2000 OH R SPLIT Black argued that she was racially discriminated<br />

against and that her reassignment violated her First,<br />

Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments and was retaliation<br />

for her EEOC claim where she reported her<br />

supervisor’s (principal) assumed extra-marital affair<br />

where sexual activity was occurring on school grounds<br />

during school hours.<br />

2005 MO NR S Reed contended that her non-renewal for failed<br />

leadership which was based on sexual harassment and<br />

interpersonal strife was carried out in retaliation for her<br />

gender discrimination claims following her extra-<br />

marital affair with another district employee.<br />

2005 CT NR S Tilghman claimed that his non-renewal was based on<br />

racial discrimination.<br />

2007 NY T S Woods argued that her termination for failed<br />

leadership and interpersonal strife was a violation of<br />

her First Amendment rights and based on racial<br />

discrimination.<br />

(table continues)<br />

331

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!