15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

carried out in reaction to the declining enrollment and tax revenue and done so pursuant to G. L.<br />

c. 59 § 20A. Moreover, the plan was approved by the board in majority. Thus, the reorganization<br />

was legal and not arbitrarily or capriciously carried out. Because the court found that the<br />

reorganization was valid, Breslin et al. had no grounds to appeal on because their “demotion”--<br />

more aptly termed reassignment--was a valid systemic reorganization whereby demotion<br />

hearings were not mandatory.<br />

Disposition: The judgment was affirmed.<br />

Citation: Rabon v. Bryan County Board of Education, 173 Ga. App. 507; 326 S.E.2d 577,<br />

(1985 Ga. App.).<br />

Key Facts: Lee Rabon was principal of Bryan County High School. Rabon offended a<br />

number of different teachers by making inappropriate and unprofessional remarks about students<br />

and discussing matters of sex with teachers.<br />

The Bryan County Board of Education referred the situation to the Professional Practices<br />

Commission (PPC). Following the PPC’s investigation, it recommended a suspension without<br />

pay for 60 days. The board, however, chose to terminate Rabon based on the facts found in the<br />

PPC’s investigation. The board agreed that Rabon had irreparably injured his own ability to<br />

communicate effectively and instill confidence as the leader of the school. Thus, Rabon was<br />

terminated on the grounds of “incompetency” and “good and sufficient cause.” Rabon brought<br />

suit in the Bryan County Superior Court. The court affirmed the board’s decision. Rabon<br />

appealed.<br />

Issues: Was the board bound to accept the disciplinary measures prescribed by the PPC?<br />

Holding: The court held that the board acted completely within its authority pursuant to<br />

O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1160 (c).<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!