15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

skills are of the utmost importance if an administrator is to achieve a successful working career<br />

in schools.<br />

Upstanding behavior. Table 45 is a break from the previous tables where poor behaviors<br />

of administrators often resulted in adverse employment actions. In the five cases included here,<br />

administrators acted in good faith and the best interests of the school but were punished out of<br />

retaliation for their upstanding behavior. In three out of the five cases, the employee prevailed on<br />

the claim and in the other two cases, the history of the case suggested that the employee would<br />

have prevailed if for example the complaint had been filed in a timely manner.<br />

Table 45<br />

Upstanding Behavior with Litigative Claim<br />

Case Year State Action PP Litigative Claim<br />

Ledew v. School<br />

Bd.<br />

Patten v. Grant<br />

Joint Union High<br />

School Dist.<br />

Fiero v. City of<br />

New York<br />

Moore v.<br />

Middletown<br />

Enlarged City<br />

School Dist.<br />

Corbett v.<br />

Duering<br />

1984 FL T E Ledew claimed that he was constructively discharged<br />

because of his speech with the State Attorney’s Office<br />

about administrative irregularities which was protected<br />

by the First Amendment.<br />

2005 CA R E Patten alleged that her reassignment to another school<br />

was retaliation for her reporting a fund transfer scam by<br />

the district to a state senator which was deemed an<br />

illegal activity.<br />

2008 NY R E Fiero argued that his reassignment for insubordination<br />

was a First Amendment retaliation violation for refusing<br />

his female principal’s sexual advances and refusing to<br />

assist her in falsely reporting teacher evaluations.<br />

2008 NY R S Moore claimed that his reassignment was retaliation for<br />

his report of an apparent inappropriate relationship<br />

between the superintendent and a student.<br />

2010 WV T S Corbett claimed that his termination was a violation of<br />

the First Amendment because he refused to “make<br />

deals’ in regard to discipline with students with<br />

influential parents, and he alleged that the<br />

superintendent retaliated against him for his speech and<br />

failure to acquiesce.<br />

368

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!