15.08.2013 Views

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Key Facts: The surrounding facts of this case are voluminous but those that are pertinent<br />

are as follows. Everson was hired as a probationary principal in November 2000 to a 2-year term<br />

by Dr. Beulah Mitchell, then superintendent of Highland Park Schools. Mitchell became mired in<br />

controversy in Spring 2001 and was ultimately terminated by the board. During the board<br />

meetings and hearings regarding Mitchell’s status, Everson was openly vocal speaking out on<br />

behalf of Mitchell.<br />

Roughly one month later, Everson was confronted by the maintenance supervisor, John<br />

Powell, requesting that she sign her contract--Everson had been working without a written<br />

contract--which she did and she was thereby notified by John White, interim superintendent, that<br />

he was recommending her termination at the April 10, 2001, board meeting. The board voted to<br />

terminate Everson’s position and she brought suit thereafter alleging violations of her First<br />

Amendment rights as well as statutory violations of due process and breach of contract. The<br />

district court granted summary judgment to the defendants on all parts. Everson appealed on<br />

grounds of her breach of contract claim and her First Amendment rights.<br />

Issues: (1) Did the board violate Everson’s contract? (2) Did the board’s actions abridge<br />

Everson’s First Amendment rights to free speech?<br />

Holding: The court held that the board did not breach Everson’s contract as she was a<br />

probationary employee. However, the court also found the presentation of evidence and the<br />

motivations of the board to be very sketchy and held that further proceedings were necessary to<br />

properly rule on Everson’s First Amendment claim.<br />

Reasoning: First, the contract that Everson signed just prior to her termination<br />

specifically stated that she could be discharged without cause during her probationary period,<br />

which constituted the first year of her contract. Citing M.C.L. § 380.1229 of Michigan law,<br />

205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!