23.10.2012 Views

Tackling the future challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry - vTI

Tackling the future challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry - vTI

Tackling the future challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry - vTI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

! Agriculture and Forestry Research, Special Issue No 362 (Braunschweig, 2012) ISSN 0376-0723<br />

Download: www.vti.bund.de/en/startseite/vti-publications/landbauforschung-special-issues.html<br />

Table 1. survey <strong>of</strong> project farms<br />

134<br />

n farms Cows/farm Daily Milk<br />

Yield (kg)<br />

Average<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

lactations<br />

Concentrate (DM) in kg/cow/year<br />

(% <strong>of</strong> yearly DM ratio)<br />

Group 1 10 18.4 17.4 3.7 278 (4.3%)<br />

Group 2 34 22.8 19.5 3.7 369.7 (5.7%)<br />

Group 3 16 23 21.4 3.6 594.9 (9.2%)<br />

Group 4 9 20.5 16.5 3.6 16.1 1 (0.3%)<br />

All farms 69 21.9 19.3 3.6 362.6 (5.6%)<br />

1 concentrate free farms, but <strong>the</strong>y feed wheat bran, which is included in <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> concentrate by Bio Suisse regu-<br />

lations<br />

The study was conducted from 2009 to 2011. In <strong>the</strong> first year (Y0) concentrate feeding, milk recordings,<br />

fertility and veterinary treatments data on farm level have been collected retrospectively<br />

without any changes in feeding management. The second year (Y1) was <strong>the</strong> transition year to concentrate<br />

minimization and <strong>the</strong> third year was <strong>the</strong> investigation year (Y2).<br />

The farms were visited 4 times a year, in winter and summer and during <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> transition feeding<br />

in spring and autumn. During <strong>the</strong> farm visits body condition (BCS) <strong>of</strong> all cows was estimated<br />

and all veterinary treatments, <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> concentrate fed per year on farm level, <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> forage, and <strong>the</strong> feeding management were registered.<br />

At every farm visit <strong>the</strong> farmer and <strong>the</strong> FiBL-adviser discussed <strong>the</strong> current feeding and herd health<br />

situation and also problems <strong>of</strong> individual cows in detail considering all available data.<br />

Milk recording data provided by <strong>the</strong> Swiss breeding associations were analyzed yearly eleven times<br />

and <strong>the</strong> farmers were given a comment on health status and feeding situation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir herd based on<br />

each milk recording.<br />

Results<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> concentrate use (kg DM per cow and year)<br />

Group 1 reduced concentrate significantly by about 70% (p< 0.001) or 204 kg DM per cow and<br />

year. Half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> farms reached <strong>the</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> concentrate free feeding. Group 2 reduced concentrate<br />

significantly by about 24% (p< 0.01) or 90 kg DM per cow and year. Two thirds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> farms<br />

reached <strong>the</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> less than 5% concentrate in <strong>the</strong> ration (DM). Group 3 was <strong>the</strong> control group<br />

without changes in feeding management, but <strong>the</strong>re was a reduction <strong>of</strong> concentrate by 9% or 49 kg<br />

DM per cow and year. Group 4 abstained from wheat bran and reduced to zero concentrate. In average,<br />

all 69 farms significantly reduced <strong>the</strong> concentrate use by 24% (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!