Tackling the future challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry - vTI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

! Agriculture and Forestry Research, Special Issue No 362 (Braunschweig, 2012) ISSN 0376-0723 Download: www.vti.bund.de/en/startseite/vti-publications/landbauforschung-special-issues.html lence. The median reduction for the farms in the upper quartile of initial prevalence (above 36%) was 22 percentage points (range: reduced by 52 to increased by 3) while the median change was zero (range: reduced by 9 to increased by 9) for the lower quartile, which were initially below 16% prevalence. Of the 23 farms that began with a prevalence of 20% or less, ten improved further, six of these by more than three percentage points. To illustrate the types of interventions that were successful on farms with high and low initial lameness prevalence, management changes are summarized for two groups of farms – the ten farms with the greatest reduction in lameness over the project (H), and the six farms where an initial lameness prevalence below 20% was further reduced by more than three percentage points (L). Some initial descriptors and the main management changes for these two groups are shown in Table 1. In Group H in all but one herd the cows were housed in cubicles, with a variety of different bedding materials including straw, chopped paper and sawdust, with or without mats. Six of the farms were using a footbath at the start of the project. In group L all but one of the herds were housed in straw yards and only one farm was using a footbath. In group H the changes most commonly occurring were building or improving tracks, improving cubicle comfort, more frequent footbathing, more foot trimming, and new staff. In group L improving tracks was again the most common activity. Four farmers obtained a new handling crush which made foot treatment and trimming easier, and two specifically mentioned that they succeeded in treating cows more promptly. Three farmers in this group improved the hygiene of the floors in the buildings by increasing the frequency or effectiveness of removing slurry and manure. On three farms there were major changes to buildings incorporating a new milking parlour and/or increased lying area for the cows. Only one of these farms was footbathing at the start of the project and none started footbathing. Discussion Organic farmers tackled lameness by a variety of methods, as would be expected given the multifactorial nature of the problem and the different types of lesions causing lameness. In herds with high lameness prevalence, increasing the time cows spent lying down was more commonly attempted by improving cubicle comfort, rather than by reducing standing times around milking. This may have been because farmers found it easier to make a structural change than to change the way in which they grouped and moved cows, which was often dictated by logistics imposed by building design and availability of staff. In contrast, there were some farmers in the group with lowest initial lameness prevalence (more of whom housed cows in straw yards) who built new facilities during the project. These alterations either created more lying space or reduced the time cows spent away from the lying area during milking, increasing the opportunity for cows to lie down, which may have contributed to a further reduction in lameness. Among the activities directed at improving underfoot surfaces, it was more common for farmers (particularly those with high lameness prevalence) to improve outdoor tracks than indoor floor surfaces. As organic farms tend to have a long grazing season access to pasture is frequently needed and the outdoor environment has a large influence on the cows. The risk assessments sometimes detected deficiencies with indoor surfaces, such as rough or slippery floors or broken concrete on yards, as well as risks associated with the tracks, or lack of tracks, but these were less often addressed. A change of staff quite often occurred on farms achieving improvements, and it is likely that this was beneficial, bringing new skills or enthusiasm to contribute to lameness control. Several farmers recognized that investment in equipment which made foot trimming and treatment easier increased the likelihood of prompt treatment, which will prevent development of severe lameness. The project has shown that it is possible to reduce lameness from a range of initial levels by a combination of farm specific interventions. Further progress might be made if farmers paid more attention to the cleanliness of floors. This was an area where farmers with a large herd problem seemed less likely to take action than those with a lesser lameness problem. 146
RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (Ed.) (2012): Tackling the Future Challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry. Proceedings of the 2 nd OAHC, Hamburg/Trenthorst, Germany, Sep 12-14, 2012 Suggestions to tackle the future challenges of organic animal husbandry One challenge to reducing lameness in organic herds is the treatment of digital dermatitis. Acceptable agents for use in topical treatment and footbaths are required as alternatives to antibiotics and unpleasant and polluting substances including copper sulphate and formalin. Another simple challenge is to encourage farmers to pay more attention to the cleanliness of floors and cows’ feet; there appears to be resistance to this based on perceived difficulties of practicalities. References Barker ZE, Leach KA, Whay HR, Bell NJ and Main DCJ (2010): Assessment of lameness prevalence and associated risk factors in dairy herds in England and Wales. Journal of Dairy Science 9, 932-941. 147
Page 1 and 2:
Sonderheft 362 Special Issue Tackli
Page 3:
Landbauforschung vTI Agriculture an
Page 7 and 8:
Foreword Organic animal husbandry s
Page 9 and 10:
RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (Ed.) (2012):
Page 11 and 12:
Content RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (Ed.)
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Introduction RAHMANN G & GODINHO D
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
References RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (E
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Abstract RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (Ed.
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Discussion RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (E
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Factors Plant Height (cm) RAHMANN G
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102: RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (Ed.) (2012):
Page 105 and 106: Discussion RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (E
Page 109 and 110: Introduction RAHMANN G & GODINHO D
Page 113 and 114: Introduction RAHMANN G & GODINHO D
Page 123 and 124: Abstract RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (Ed.
Page 129 and 130: Discussion RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (E
Page 151: RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (Ed.) (2012):
Page 173 and 174: References RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (E
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Results RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (Ed.)
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
FEC adjusted for dry matter 12000 1
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Conclusions RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Introduction RAHMANN G & GODINHO D
Page 355 and 356:
349 Table 1. Breeding information o
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
Kg liveweight (mean) RAHMANN G & GO
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
Page 489:
348 Herwart Böhm (Hrsg.) (2011) Op
show all

Tackling the future challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry - vTI

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?