23.10.2012 Views

Tackling the future challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry - vTI

Tackling the future challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry - vTI

Tackling the future challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry - vTI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

! Agriculture and Forestry Research, Special Issue No 362 (Braunschweig, 2012) ISSN 0376-0723<br />

Download: www.vti.bund.de/en/startseite/vti-publications/landbauforschung-special-issues.html<br />

Abstract<br />

188<br />

How much space do horned dairy cows need<br />

in <strong>the</strong> waiting area?<br />

KATHARINA A. ZIPP 1 , SARAH BRANDT 1 , NORA IRRGANG 1 , UTE KNIERIM 1<br />

1 Farm <strong>Animal</strong> Behaviour and <strong>Husbandry</strong> Section, University <strong>of</strong> Kassel, Germany, www.unikassel.de/agrar/fnt,<br />

Email: zipp@uni-kassel.de<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> three difference space allowances in <strong>the</strong> waiting area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> milking parlour (4.0,<br />

2.5, 1.7 m²/cow) on <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> physical agonistic interactions (‘attacks’) per minute in this<br />

place, number <strong>of</strong> flinches, steps and kicks (FSK) per minute in <strong>the</strong> parlour and heart rate (HR) in<br />

both areas was investigated in 12 lower and 12 higher ranking focal cows in a research herd <strong>of</strong> 85-<br />

87 horned German Black Pied cattle. Social position had no influence on HR and behaviour. HR in<br />

<strong>the</strong> waiting area and parlour and FSK increased with decreasing space allowance. HR was significantly<br />

higher in V1.7 than in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two pen sizes, FSK in V1.7 compared to V4.0. ‘Attacks’ occurred<br />

fewest in V2.5 with a significant difference compared to V1.7. Thus, in terms <strong>of</strong> animal welfare<br />

and milker’s working comfort a space allowance <strong>of</strong> 1.7 m²/horned cow in <strong>the</strong> waiting area is<br />

not advisable. Major benefits <strong>of</strong> V4.0 were not detected under <strong>the</strong> given conditions.<br />

Key words: agonistic behaviour, heart rate, animal welfare, milking parlour<br />

Introduction<br />

A potential hot spot <strong>of</strong> agonistic behaviour in dairy cows is <strong>the</strong> waiting area before <strong>the</strong> milking parlour<br />

(Schneider et al. 2009). Menke et al. (1999) found a negative correlation between general space<br />

availability per cow and agonistic behaviour and skin lesions caused by horn butts. Crowding <strong>the</strong><br />

cows so that <strong>the</strong>y can hardly move, was found to decrease agonistic behaviour, but to increase heart<br />

rate (HR) up to 25% (Czako 1978), indicating stress. Social rank may modify <strong>the</strong> stress reaction to<br />

space restriction (Aschwanden et al. 2008). Finally, stress may influence behaviour and HR <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

cows in <strong>the</strong> parlour (Rushen et al. 2001), so that space allowance in <strong>the</strong> waiting area may affect<br />

<strong>the</strong>se, too.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to assess <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> injury and stress level <strong>of</strong> horned higher and lower<br />

ranking cows in <strong>the</strong> waiting area and parlour at three different space allowances by measuring HR<br />

as well as <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> agonistic interactions before and agitation behaviour during milking.<br />

<strong>Animal</strong>s, material and methodology<br />

In September 2009 <strong>the</strong> experiment was conducted on <strong>the</strong> research farm <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Kassel<br />

where at this time 85-87 lactating cows <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> breed German Black Pied were housed in a loose<br />

housing barn with 48 deep bed cubicles and a deep litter area <strong>of</strong> 312.5 m². Out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lactating,<br />

horned animals without lameness or o<strong>the</strong>r impairments <strong>of</strong> health 12 higher and 12 lower ranking<br />

focal cows were chosen via counting <strong>the</strong> injuries and hairless areas caused by horn butts and observation<br />

<strong>of</strong> agonistic behaviour (2x 2h) at <strong>the</strong> feeding rack (rank index: Schrader 2002). The data <strong>of</strong><br />

one higher and one lower ranking cow were eliminated from analysis because <strong>the</strong>y became lame or<br />

came in heat during <strong>the</strong> experiment. Due to missing values <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> analysed animals decreased<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r for some parameters (n see Table 1).<br />

In three consecutive weeks <strong>the</strong> cows were subjected to three space allowances, beginning with <strong>the</strong><br />

largest and <strong>the</strong>n decreasing space: 4.0, 2.5 and 1.7 m²/cow (V4.0, V2.5, V1.7). Before <strong>the</strong> experiment,<br />

<strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> waiting area was about 2.3 m²/cow. In <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> milking <strong>the</strong> space allowance<br />

in <strong>the</strong> waiting area increased because cows went into <strong>the</strong> parlour and size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> waiting area<br />

was not adjusted. At each space allowance, <strong>the</strong> cows had at least two days to adjust following four

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!