Tackling the future challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry - vTI
Tackling the future challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry - vTI
Tackling the future challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry - vTI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
RAHMANN G & GODINHO D (Ed.) (2012): <strong>Tackling</strong> <strong>the</strong> Future Challenges <strong>of</strong> <strong>Organic</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Husbandry</strong>.<br />
Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2 nd OAHC, Hamburg/Trenthorst, Germany, Sep 12-14, 2012<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir opinions on <strong>the</strong>se issues and <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alternatives in organic farming. Afterwards<br />
four packages (80 g) <strong>of</strong> organic smoked salami were auctioned. The only difference between<br />
<strong>the</strong> salamis was <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> castration used. Consumers were informed about <strong>the</strong> bidding mechanism<br />
<strong>of</strong> a Vickrey auction and told that <strong>the</strong> “winner” had to buy <strong>the</strong> auctioned package. If participants<br />
did not want to buy one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> salamis at all, <strong>the</strong>y could place a bid <strong>of</strong> zero. The focus group<br />
discussions were audio- and videotaped and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative content analysis following<br />
Gläser and Laudel (2006) was applied. The auction data were analyzed using descriptive<br />
statistics (SPSS 19).<br />
89 consumers <strong>of</strong> organic pork participated in <strong>the</strong> study. 62 % <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> participants were women and<br />
50 % each were 18 to 44 or ra<strong>the</strong>r 45 to 75 years old. Most participants (80 %) were intensive consumers<br />
<strong>of</strong> organic food.<br />
Results<br />
Perception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alternatives<br />
Participants strongly rejected castration without pain relief. The practice was contrary to <strong>the</strong>ir image<br />
<strong>of</strong> animal friendly husbandry in organic farming. Altoge<strong>the</strong>r, knowledge and awareness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> issue<br />
<strong>of</strong> piglet castration was low among participants. The criteria animal welfare, health/food safety,<br />
taste, organic farming and costs were important for participants’ evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alternatives.<br />
<strong>Animal</strong> welfare was particularly important for <strong>the</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> castration with anes<strong>the</strong>sia and analgesia<br />
and fattening <strong>of</strong> boars. While castration with pain relief was predominantly considered as positive<br />
with respect to animal welfare, opinions were divided with regard to fattening <strong>of</strong> boars as on<br />
<strong>the</strong> one hand <strong>the</strong>re is no pain due to surgical interventions and on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand <strong>the</strong>re are possible<br />
problems with increased aggressive behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> animals. Immunocastration was mainly seen as<br />
positive for <strong>the</strong> pigs.<br />
Food safety was a mayor issue with immunocastration and with castration with pain relief due to<br />
suspected residues and negative health effects for consumers. Possible food safety risks <strong>of</strong> immunocastration<br />
were seen as more severe than <strong>of</strong> castration with anes<strong>the</strong>sia and analgesia because immunocastration<br />
was associated with hormones. In contrast, many participants regarded <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong><br />
residues <strong>of</strong> anes<strong>the</strong>tics and analgesics as low. The food safety issue dominated <strong>the</strong> discussion on<br />
immunocastration and o<strong>the</strong>r criteria seemed less important in comparison.<br />
The discussion on taste focused on boar meat. This criterion did not play a role for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r alternatives.<br />
The discussion was characterized by great uncertainty regarding odor and flavor <strong>of</strong> boar taint<br />
and <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> tainted meat. With exception <strong>of</strong> a few persons, none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> participants had personally<br />
experienced boar taint in meat before.<br />
As regards organic farming <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> drugs for castration with anes<strong>the</strong>sia and analgesia as well as<br />
for immunocastration was considered inappropriate. Fattening <strong>of</strong> boars was <strong>the</strong> only alternative<br />
deemed explicitly as suitable for organic farming due to its supposed naturalness.<br />
Costs <strong>of</strong> castration with pain relief and fattening <strong>of</strong> boars were regarded as supposedly high and<br />
increased meat prices for consumers were feared. In this context, some participants criticized <strong>the</strong><br />
sorting out <strong>of</strong> tainted carcasses without an appropriate use as wastefulness which not only presents<br />
an economical but also an ethical problem.<br />
Willingness-to-pay for <strong>the</strong> alternatives<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Vickrey-Auctions reflected <strong>the</strong> previous discussions. Table 1 shows <strong>the</strong> average<br />
willingness-to-pay for <strong>the</strong> different methods and <strong>the</strong> corresponding share <strong>of</strong> zero-bids. Average<br />
willingness-to-pay for castration with anes<strong>the</strong>sia and analgesia was highest with 2.17 € for 80 g <strong>of</strong><br />
salami and <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> zero-bids was lowest. Considering <strong>the</strong> focus group results, it can be assumed<br />
that consumers preferred this alternative because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> improved animal welfare and <strong>the</strong><br />
293