23.10.2012 Views

Tackling the future challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry - vTI

Tackling the future challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry - vTI

Tackling the future challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry - vTI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

! Agriculture and Forestry Research, Special Issue No 362 (Braunschweig, 2012) ISSN 0376-0723<br />

Download: www.vti.bund.de/en/startseite/vti-publications/landbauforschung-special-issues.html<br />

Abstract<br />

404<br />

Green fodder Cultivation and <strong>the</strong>ir Feeding Practices by<br />

Indian Livestock Owners: Under climate change conditions<br />

NIRANJAN LAL, H.P.S. ARYA, M.P.SAGAR AND RENU SINGH<br />

Central Avian Research Institue, Izatnagar (243122), UP India<br />

Indian agriculture is oriented towards crop cultivation. Livestock, dairy and poultry farming are<br />

<strong>the</strong> least developed branches <strong>of</strong> Indian agriculture. Perhaps <strong>the</strong> reason for lesser attention towards<br />

<strong>the</strong>se branches is <strong>the</strong> character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> season and natural vegetation, which can provide a very<br />

small proportion <strong>of</strong> nutrients to animals in terms <strong>of</strong> quality and quantity. The optimum grazing<br />

season does not extent for more than 4-5 months in a year.<br />

Key word: Pr<strong>of</strong>itability, Green fodder, Farmers, Scientist, Perception.<br />

Introduction<br />

Green fodder cultivation is not a new farming practice in Indian perspective. While all <strong>the</strong> cultivating<br />

communities were growing protein-rich nutritive green fodder for <strong>the</strong>ir livestock. The perception<br />

about green fodder cultivation and its use could be <strong>the</strong> same as that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scientists. In order to<br />

examine and confirm this view, this study was conducted in Bareilly district <strong>of</strong> U.P. (India).<br />

The study was carried out a cluster <strong>of</strong> 6 villages <strong>of</strong> Bareilly district <strong>of</strong> Uttar Pradesh. A maximum <strong>of</strong><br />

40 minimum <strong>of</strong> 10 respondents were selected from those who had been using <strong>the</strong> selected animal<br />

husbandry technologies advocated by various agencies since last 5 years (1994-98). Thus, 200 livestock<br />

owners constituted <strong>the</strong> sample size for <strong>the</strong> study. Simultaneously, 50 scientists were also<br />

selected as respondents to obtain <strong>the</strong>ir perception for <strong>the</strong> comparison. Data were collected through<br />

personal interviews as well as through Participatory Rural Appraisal Techniques, group meeting<br />

and analyzed by different statistical method.<br />

The pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> FMD vaccination was operational zed as <strong>the</strong> farmer’s or expert’s perception <strong>of</strong><br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it occurring or which likely to occur due to this vaccination. The response was taken on a 5<br />

point scale viz., highly pr<strong>of</strong>itable, pr<strong>of</strong>itable, somewhat pr<strong>of</strong>itable, least pr<strong>of</strong>itable and not at all<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itable.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> respondents<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> house holds (63.00%) had less that 5 animal workers in <strong>the</strong>ir family involved performing<br />

<strong>the</strong> animal husbandry tasks in comprehensive way followed by 34.5% respondents who<br />

had 5-7 animal workers. Majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vaccination users (57.5%) belonged to <strong>the</strong> middle age<br />

group (30-35 yrs) followed by young (23.00%0 and old age (19.50%). Out <strong>of</strong> which 46% were from<br />

OBC category and 33% from General had marginal land holding (≤1) followed by small (36.50%)<br />

and large (18.50%) wherein 55.50% respondents had area under fodder crops grown like Barseem<br />

and Makcheri less than 4 bigha followed by 33.50% 4-6bigha and 11% more than 6 begha levels<br />

covered in fodder production for <strong>the</strong>ir good health. The data clearly showed that very few respondents<br />

4.50% had large size <strong>of</strong> herd (≤8 nos) whereas 51.50% respondents had small size <strong>of</strong> heard.<br />

Majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> respondents had low cropping intensity i.e. 221-240. Only 2% respondents had low<br />

cropping intensity i.e. 220%. The data fur<strong>the</strong>r depicted that Desi-cattle with majority <strong>of</strong> respondents<br />

(58.50%) were medium producers (4-5lit) <strong>of</strong> milk per day followed by 34.50% ownerswere producing<br />

(less that 4 lit per day and only 7% respondents were producing more that 5 liter <strong>of</strong> milk per<br />

day). Majority <strong>of</strong> crossbred cattle owners (57%) comes under high milk produces (i.e. 8 lit. per day

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!