06.10.2013 Views

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

disposition of the orchestra meant the Kyrie could only have been written during the visit to<br />

Munich. The lavish orchestration is certainly unprecedented in Mozart’s church music,<br />

particularly the inclusion of clarinets and four horns. Jahn also raised the possibility that<br />

Mozart left the work as a fragment, although one would expect André to have mentioned<br />

that fact in the first edition if it were so, given his care over the editions of the Requiem and<br />

C minor Mass. Mozart does seem to have been interested in displaying his wares to the<br />

Munich Hofkapelle, for he wrote to Leopold on 13 November 1780: “haben Sie doch die<br />

güte und schicken mir die 2 sparten von den Messen die ich mithabe – und die Messe aus<br />

dem B auch. denn graf Seeau wird nächstens dem Churfürsten etwas davon sagen. – ich<br />

möchte daß man mich in diesem styl auch kennen lernte.” 201<br />

The challenge to Jahn’s dating arrived in 1981 with Tyson’s article on the Salzburg<br />

fragments. Tyson considered that there was “little to be said in favor” of a Munich origin for<br />

the Kyrie, and suggested that, with the new knowledge that Mozart was working on sacred<br />

music in the last years of his life, a date between 1788 and 17<strong>91</strong> was more likely. Tyson<br />

expressed the same opinion in more moderate form two years later, 202 but did not, as far as I<br />

am aware, ever mount a detailed challenge to Jahn’s case for a Munich origin. As matters<br />

stood, in other words, a Viennese date had emerged as a possibility solely on the knowledge<br />

that Mozart had started several sacred works at that time. Purely on the basis of<br />

contemporaneous activity in sacred music, however, one could mount an equally convincing<br />

case for Munich, with Mozart’s known desire to impress the Elector and the instrumental<br />

characteristics of the Kyrie coming into play. The crucial point is that no detailed case was<br />

ever presented against Jahn’s dating, nor was there an explanation of why a Viennese origin<br />

was more likely. It has been surprising, then, to observe the quick acceptance of Tyson’s<br />

201 MBA, ii.19.<br />

202 Tyson, “The Mozart Fragments,” 342n34, 27. See also Tyson, “Proposed New Dates,” 216.<br />

195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!