06.10.2013 Views

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the “etwas kleinere” mass offered on the same date. However, the Hofkapelle numbers are a<br />

common internal feature of the archive where more than one mass by a composer was found,<br />

and do not necessarily reflect Traeg’s own numbering scheme. Nor does the process work in<br />

reverse: with the possible exception of K. 337, the Hofkapelle sources are not<br />

contemporaneous with the advertisements, so the case for identifying the works Traeg<br />

advertised on the basis of the Hofkapelle’s numbering scheme is not particularly strong.<br />

Is it possible that one or more of the early Hofkapelle scores are Traeg copies?<br />

Viennese Mozart-Copyist 3, the copyist of the Hofkapelle’s scores of K. 337 and K. 258, may<br />

have worked for Traeg in the late 1790s. 253 However, VMC-3 may have also worked for<br />

Sukowaty, 254 who operated to an undetermined degree as the ensemble’s regular copyist, at<br />

least in name. VMC-3’s long career as a copyist for the Hofkapelle did in fact extend well<br />

before the advent of Sukowaty and Traeg, so there may have been an agreement with the<br />

ensemble that bypassed both firms.<br />

Despite the uncertain origin of the Hofkapelle’s copies, it seems likely that the<br />

ensemble acquired its first Mozart masses in the order K. 337, K. 317 and K. 258. This is<br />

not only consistent with the forensic evidence but suggested by the Hofkapelle’s two<br />

catalogues, one of which I have already mentioned. 255 The relationship between them is not<br />

entirely clear: the entries for Reutter, Gassmann and Bonno list almost exactly the same<br />

music, but the ÖNB copy was kept up-to-date for longer, and contains much of Eybler’s<br />

later church music. The latest works in Salieri’s Handexemplar, on the other hand, are from<br />

the first decade of the nineteenth century, and Salieri’s own church music, strangely enough,<br />

is hardly listed. 256 Both are complex documents with annotations, corrections and additional<br />

253 MVC, 944, 1157-59.<br />

254 Ibid., 1161.<br />

255 A-Wgm, 22551/33 and A-Wn, INV I/Josef II.1 (olim Mus. Hs. 2454).<br />

256 See Pfannhauser, "Mozarts Kirchenmusikalische Studien," 14n62.<br />

222

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!