06.10.2013 Views

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SmWV 226. Both operas are undated, but the handwriting makes clear that these are works<br />

from Süssmayr’s early years in Vienna, probably between 1788 and 17<strong>91</strong>. 156 Although one<br />

would wish for a wider sample of manuscripts with this watermark, paper bearing this design<br />

was very likely available when Mozart’s “motet” was copied in May 17<strong>91</strong>. It may be objected<br />

that Misericordias is not a motet but an offertory, and thus cannot correspond to the account<br />

book entry. The term “motet,” however, was open to a wide variety of interpretations,<br />

especially one with as a general as text as Misericordias. 157<br />

In its original state, the set consisted of two copies each of Canto, Alto, Tenore and<br />

Basso, three copies of Violino Primo, two copies of Violino Secondo, and single copies of<br />

Violoncello, Violone and Organo. Parts for alto and tenor trombone may be contemporary<br />

or a little later, and there are additional vocal, string and horn parts dating from the<br />

nineteenth century. 158 Where did Spangler obtain these parts? As we have seen in Chapter<br />

Three, Misericordias was performed at Frankfurt in 1792 and was in the possession of Traeg<br />

by the mid-1790s, so it may have been circulating by 17<strong>91</strong>. However, we also know that<br />

Mozart had a set of parts for the motet in his possession, and the possibility cannot be<br />

excluded that he had some role in Spangler’s acquisition of the motet. Even if he did not, it<br />

is now evident that Mozart’s music was already known at the church when in December<br />

17<strong>91</strong> a requiem mass was performed for him. Given the similarities of key and motivic<br />

construction between Misericordias and the Introit of the Requiem, it is somehow<br />

appropriate that this motet could have been heard at St. Michael’s in the second half of<br />

17<strong>91</strong>.<br />

156 SmWV, 129-33, 347.<br />

157 It is possible that the work was copied for the Feast of St. Johann Nepomuk on 16 May. The account book<br />

for May 17<strong>91</strong> shows a payment of 6fl 48xr for the hiring of extra musicians at this feast.<br />

158 The watermark of the trombone parts is three moons | the letters VF joined together. One of the horn parts<br />

is signed “Eduard König/[1]845/den 19ten Februar.”<br />

392

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!