06.10.2013 Views

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Daß die ohnöthigen bildereyen in den kirchen, die vielen opfertafeln, und instrumental=musique<br />

etc: |: was hier geschehen wird :| bey ihnen schon abgekommen sind – war mir etwas Neues. – da<br />

glaubt der vermuthlich sich dadurch beym einzuschmeicheln; aber ich<br />

glaube schwerlich dass diese seine Politique von grossem nutzen seyn mag. 105<br />

Mozart’s use of “instrumental=musique” appears to conform to other uses of the term we<br />

have encountered throughout this chapter, implying not only instrumental pieces but also<br />

choral works accompanied by an ensemble. If this is true, then the mention of paintings,<br />

tablets, music, “etc.” in one phrase may seem rather dismissive and indicative of little regard<br />

for the musical and liturgical tradition to which Mozart had contributed over the past<br />

decade. It is possible that Mozart did indeed feel that way about sacred music at that point in<br />

time. However, the fact that he had likely begun work on the C minor Mass by September<br />

1782 suggests that the dismissive tone and references to “useless” paintings are meant<br />

sarcastically, as so often when Mozart mentioned Archbishop Colloredo.<br />

A notable feature of this passage is Mozart’s knowledge of reforms that were yet to be<br />

implemented in Vienna (“was hier geschehen wird”), and one must naturally wonder where<br />

he heard about them. In the same month that this letter was written, Joseph prepared his<br />

directive to Baron Kressel, setting out for the first time his views on church music, but none<br />

of this material was made public. Most paintings and votive tablets were indeed eventually<br />

banned, but not until February 1784. 106 It is possible that Mozart was referring to the ban of<br />

May 1782 on all “unnecessary” decoration in churches, but that directive had already passed<br />

and did not specify particular items in the same way that composer named them. We must<br />

consider the possibility that Mozart had “insider” knowledge through his various aristocratic<br />

contacts, and perhaps church contacts as well.<br />

105 MBA, iii.231.<br />

106 AVA A-Cultus 11 Gen 412/2/1784; RGZJ, 485.<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!