06.10.2013 Views

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

MOZART AND THE PRACTICE OF SACRED MUSIC, 1781-91 a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

y the composer before March 17<strong>91</strong> (see below). K. 626 may be the first Requiem written in<br />

Vienna for a number of years, as I have been unable to identify any other setting dating from<br />

<strong>1781</strong>-<strong>91</strong>. 40 A number of requiem settings did however appear soon after: a setting in C<br />

minor by Krottendorfer dated 1793, a D minor setting by Albrechtsberger (Schröder A.I.15),<br />

also from 1793, and a setting by Pasterwitz (Kaas Messen 11) from the early 1790s. 41<br />

It is conceivable that Mozart envisaged eventual performances of the Requiem at St.<br />

Stephen’s or the Hofkapelle, as both institutions had constant need of missae pro defunctis.<br />

With the scoring of the work for basset horns, however, Mozart set an obstacle in the way of<br />

anyone wishing to perform the Requiem in Vienna – let alone Wiener Neustadt. Basset<br />

horns were practically unknown in Viennese church music, and even clarinets were rare until<br />

the later 1790s. As we have seen, Joseph II explicitly banned clarinets from the Hofkapelle in<br />

1788. 42 Perhaps Leopold could have been more amenable, but there is no clear sign that<br />

clarinets were used in the Hofkapelle until the time of Haydn’s late masses. Church orchestras<br />

in other parts of the empire were more progressive: Druschetsky’s gradual In coeli favore,<br />

dated 24 August 17<strong>91</strong>, includes an elaborate solo for clarinet. 43 According to RISM, a set of<br />

parts in Budapest for Spangler’s Requiem includes a basset horn part, perhaps as a<br />

40 Pasterwitz did however write a set of Vesperae pro defunctis (Kaas Vespern 12) in 17<strong>91</strong>. For an overview of<br />

Viennese Requiem settings, see Christian Wurzwallner, “Requiem-Vertonungen in Wien Zwischen 1750 und<br />

1820” (Diplomarbeit, Universität Wien, 1990).<br />

41 The autograph of Krottendorfer’s Requiem, deriving from the collection of Archduke Rudolph, is in A-<br />

Wgm, I 11573/A 446a. The autograph of Albrechtsberger’s setting is in H-Bn, Ms. Mus. 2599. The earliest<br />

source for the Pasterwitz Requiem is a set of parts in A-Wn, HK 594, which bears several performance dates<br />

beginning with 18 December 1793. A partially autograph score and parts of later provenance is in A-KR, Part.<br />

Schr. and A-KR, D 45/40. An incomplete copy of the Pasterwitz Requiem was made by Michael Haydn (H-<br />

Bn, Ms. Mus. II. 3). Unfortunately, the editors of the Michael Haydn catalogue did not recognise the origin of<br />

this score and attributed the work to Haydn himself; see Petrus Eder, “Johann Michael Haydns Angebliches<br />

Mittleres Requiem MH 559,” Kirchenmusikalisches Jahrbuch 83 (1999): <strong>91</strong>-9. The misattribution was<br />

compounded by a German music journalist, Olaf Krone, who announced to the world his “discovery” of this<br />

“unknown” Haydn Requiem and had Pasterwitz’s Requiem recorded under Haydn’s name (Capriccio 71084,<br />

2006).<br />

42 “Clarinetti...sind in Hinkunpft bei Kirchen Diensten gänzlich wegzulassen.” Quoted in Link, “Mozart's<br />

Appointment,” 177.<br />

43 H-Bn, Ms. Mus. 1590.<br />

357

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!