25.12.2013 Views

0 INTRODUCTION

0 INTRODUCTION

0 INTRODUCTION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 17. Dependents of –ing and Romance nominalizations according to period .......... 195<br />

Table 18. Romance nominalizations: borrowing vs. affixation ........................................ 204<br />

Table 19. Influence of translation on borrowing. Normalized frequencies per<br />

10,000 words. (Translations from Latin or French in red) .................................... 206<br />

Table 20. Overall figures for –ing and Romance nominalizations in medical texts,<br />

according to subgenre (normalized frequencies per 10,000 words in<br />

brackets) ................................................................................................................ 211<br />

Table 21. Distribution of the bases employed in the formation of nominalizations,<br />

per suffix and audience ......................................................................................... 219<br />

Table 22. Number of bases specific to a kind of audience ............................................... 220<br />

viii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!