25.12.2013 Views

0 INTRODUCTION

0 INTRODUCTION

0 INTRODUCTION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. THE CONCEPT OF NOMINALIZATION<br />

sentences (11a) and (11b) below. Preparation in (11a) refers to the actual event of<br />

someone’s preparing a manuscript, and it is said that this event lasts for several weeks.<br />

Despite its being an event, it is treated grammatically as if it were an entity, and as such it<br />

is commented on. Mixture in (11b) refers to a concrete entity, as can be inferred from the<br />

fact that it can be ‘shaped.’ However, an event of mixing must still have taken place.<br />

(11) a. The preparation of the manuscript takes several weeks.<br />

b. The resulting mixture is shaped into balls.<br />

The “Iconicity of Lexical Categories Principle” (Hopper and Thompson 1985:<br />

178) predicts that “a form referring to an event which is being taken as an entity is<br />

functioning neither to report an event nor to refer to a manipulable entity, but has<br />

elements of both.” It could be very well expected that its morphology reflects this<br />

ambivalence, and that is why nominalizations show verbal features such as aspect or<br />

mood and argument-taking properties, as well as nominal ones such as possessive<br />

markers or determiners (see Chapter 3). As De Smet (2010: 1186) claims,<br />

[b]y their nature, deverbal nominalizations and adjectivizations are<br />

atypical members of their word class, as they designate events rather<br />

than objects or properties. It is therefore understandable that they get<br />

luted into clausal syntax, but because this requires a complex<br />

reconfiguration of the syntax of a phrase into that of a clause (...), the<br />

change is inevitably gradual. Even when the phrase has become a<br />

proper clause its distribution will still be reminiscent of its phrasal<br />

origins. The history of such nonfinite clauses is a long story of gradual<br />

dissociation from their phrasal origin.<br />

In short, despite being semantically predisposed to belong to a particular category,<br />

roots can be turned into items of a different category through derivational processes. It is<br />

sometimes the case that lexical elements, such as nominalizations, shifting from a<br />

category to another exhibit semantic and morphological features of both categories.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!