ovdje - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
ovdje - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
ovdje - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SCIENCE AND POLITICS:<br />
THE AUTHORITY OF SCIENCE IN PUBLIC<br />
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS<br />
Despite the strong scientific progress that characterizes our history of<br />
the last few centuries, erosion of scientific authority in the process of public<br />
decision-making is now present even more than before; many cultural and<br />
philosophical worldviews that consider science as just one of many worldviews<br />
undermine its influence and authority in the policy-making process.<br />
Strong anti-Darwinist movement in the United States, popular opposition<br />
to GMO cultures in the European Union, as well as ignoring scientific facts<br />
about climate change when creating industrial policies, are examples of<br />
erosion of the authority of science. Our goal is, following in part the work<br />
of Philip Kitcher, to indicate the proper role of science in the deliberative<br />
democratic society, and to draw attention to the existence of chimeric epistemology<br />
that causes erosion of scientific authority. Finally, we provide<br />
a brief overview of the issues that a well-ordered science should address,<br />
especially in the medical field, and draw attention to the implications that<br />
follow from this approach. We will also briefly outline some of the political<br />
issues in respect to which the erosion of the authority of science becomes<br />
quite clear, as well as demonstrate how a society that endorses the idea of <br />
a well-ordered science should respond to these problems.<br />
JURAJ GAJSKI<br />
Fakultet političkih znanosti, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Hrvatska /<br />
Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Zagreb, Croatia<br />
NACIONALNA SIGURNOST U 21. STOLJEĆU<br />
Konstitucija svakog živog bića takva je da svojom cjelinom djeluje u<br />
funkciji vlastite sigurnosti. Isto vrijedi za zajednice. Bez sigurnosti nema<br />
opstanka niti napretka; prijetnje su stalne i nepredvidljive. Pojedini autori<br />
tvrde da je sigurnost jedan od najčešće upotrebljavanih pojmova uopće,<br />
no istovremeno je jedan od najmanje objašnjenih. Siniša Tatalović navodi<br />
da je pojam sigurnosti važno razumjeti u odnosu na određeno razdoblje i<br />
konkretnu regiju, uzimajući u obzir njihove specifičnosti. Do 20. stoljeća<br />
sigurnost se temeljila na izgradnji jake vojske i »dizanju zidova«. U<br />
107