13.01.2014 Views

ovdje - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo

ovdje - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo

ovdje - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ON THE NEOLIBERAL PARADIGM AND<br />

CROATIAN HIGHER EDUCATION<br />

Today, most of the analysts agree: about three decades ago a turn<br />

happened. The neoclassical economic policy ceded place to a policy that<br />

basically varies already forgotten classical themes. “Invisible hand” and<br />

“laissez-faire” once again become cornerstones of economic theory and<br />

practice. This happens especially in the business world where there are<br />

many who believe that, in the process of making money, competition and<br />

the market best direct their activities towards socially beneficial result, and<br />

the only thing the parasite state does is taking taxes and creating obstacles<br />

along the way. Globalisation is taking place, the phenomenon that most<br />

strongly affects contemporary societies, especially their economies. Proponents<br />

of globalisation claim that changes are possible only with the help<br />

of the neoliberal concept, by pulling the state out of all economic activities<br />

and the entire public sector. In time they even agree to the “soft version”,<br />

which gives the government somewhat greater role, but it is always a “market<br />

friendly” policy, one that does not affect the allocation of resources at<br />

the level of activity. A comparison imposes itself: every neoliberal variation<br />

basically agrees with the fundamental postulates of the classical concept<br />

which ruled over a hundred years ago. Briefly, the market is efficient,<br />

the state is not. Regardless of resource efficiency and the public interest.<br />

The notion ‘neoliberalism’ is used in many different ways. Most often<br />

are three positions: (a) economic-pragmatic, which considers neoliberalism<br />

its developmental theory and reform economic policy, and its footholds<br />

finds in the “Washington consensus”, (b) ideological, which focuses on<br />

freedom as the greatest social value closely tied to reducing the state to its<br />

“minimum”, and (c) academic, paradigmatic, which connects neoliberalism<br />

to neoclassical economic theory. In addition, the use of the term ‘neoliberal’<br />

has different meaning in economics than in politics. (Neo)liberalism in<br />

economics refers to the “liberation” of the economy of the “state slavery”,<br />

i.e. releasing the economy in the hands of the private sector. In politics, it is<br />

the creation of a liberal atmosphere for economic development, where the<br />

state functions as the protector of private ownership rights and implements<br />

this in its spheres of influence (army, legal system, etc.). In case there is no<br />

market or that it is organised according to the neoliberal concept (land, water,<br />

education, health care, social security, environmental pollution, etc.) it<br />

will do its best to create it. Nevertheless, in accordance with the neoliberal<br />

142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!