13.01.2014 Views

ovdje - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo

ovdje - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo

ovdje - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

loga zbog kojih određeni filozofi nisu odobravali žrtvovanje životinja i<br />

njihovo korištenje u prehrani. Najprije, to su razlozi u kojima se naglašava<br />

intrinzično srodstvo životinja i ljudi, a koji impliciraju da je životinje iz<br />

supstancijalnih razloga nepravedno ubijati i jesti. Neki filozofi su, zatim,<br />

mislili da konzumiranje posebnih životinja može narušiti bliskost bogova<br />

i ljudi odnosno da je svojevrsni vegetarijanski modus življenja neophodan<br />

preduvjet za čovjekovo uzdizanje do boga. Treća grupa razloga utemeljena<br />

je na tezi da odustajanje od uništavanja životinja potiče mirotvorstvo,<br />

smanjuje mogućnost dehumanizacije ljudi i pojavu kanibalizma među<br />

njima. Konačno, autori su utvrdili i razloge contra upotrebe životinja u<br />

prehrambene svrhe koji su imali pragmatičan prizvuk, kao u slučaju zabranjivanja<br />

da se jedu tzv. radne životinje.<br />

ANCIENT UNDERSTANDING OF ANIMAL SACRIFICE<br />

AND ANIMAL CONSUMPTION<br />

In this paper the authors are analysing the attitudes of ancient philosophers<br />

who opposed to the animal oblations or refused to eat animal meat.<br />

The analysis of preserved documents has shown that there were several<br />

groups of reasons for the sake of which certain philosophers did not approve<br />

of the animal sacrifice and of the use of animals as food. Firstly,<br />

there are reasons emphasising the intrinsic kinship of animals and humans,<br />

implying that it is substantially unjust to kill and eat animals. Some philosophers,<br />

furthermore, thought that consumption of specific animals might<br />

hinder the closeness of gods and men, i.e. that a kind of vegetarian mode<br />

of living is a necessary precondition for man’s transcendence to god. The<br />

third group of reasons is based on the thesis that relinquishing of the animal<br />

killing encourages peacemaking, reduces the possibility of dehumanization<br />

of men and of the appearance of cannibalism among them. Finally, the<br />

authors have also identified the reasons contra the use of animals as food,<br />

which had a pragmatic tone, for example such as prohibition of eating the<br />

so-called working animals.<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!