ovdje - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
ovdje - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
ovdje - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ROBERT MEĐUGORAC<br />
Zagreb, Hrvatska /<br />
Zagreb, Croatia<br />
POJAM VRSIZMA: DUNAYER VS. SINGER<br />
112 godina nakon prve »prave pravaške« knjige Prava životinja (1892.)<br />
Henryja Salta i 29 godina nakon knjige Oslobođenje životinja (1975.) Petera<br />
Singera, koja idejom i argumentacijom nije mnogo različitija od prethodno<br />
spomenute, ali je revolucionarnom snagom animalističku tematiku<br />
gurnula pod reflektore javnosti i struke, dolazi druga knjiga autorice Joan<br />
Dunayer Specizam (2004.), koja je podignula letvicu obzirnosti spram neljudskih<br />
svjesnih i osjetilnih Zemljana dovoljno visoko da je više niti jedan<br />
antropošovinist, niti staro- ili novo-vrsist ne može preskočiti, što je naravno<br />
odmah podebljalo već od ranije jasnu diferenciju između dvije oprečne<br />
struje unutar pokreta za oslobođenje životinja, onu koja pod krinkom pravaštva<br />
u stvari samo zagovara regulaciju, uz izgovore »nije još vrijeme« i<br />
»treba biti umjeren«, te onu koja abolicionističkim pristupom zahtijeva trenutnu<br />
i potpunu fizičku, ustavnu i zakonsku emancipaciju svih ne-ljudskih<br />
osoba kao i čitavih naroda koji masovno stradavaju u tihom holokaustu.<br />
CONCEPT OF SPECIESISM: DUNAYER vs. SINGER<br />
112 years after the first “real animal rights” book Animals’ Rights (1892)<br />
written by Henry Salt, and 29 years after the book Animal Liberation (1975)<br />
written by Peter Singer, that doesn’t differ much from the previous one when<br />
it comes to ideas and arguments, but with its revolutionary strength it put<br />
the animal rights as a subject under the spotlight of publicity and profession,<br />
emerged Speciesism, the second book by Joan Dunayer (2004) that lift up the<br />
level of indulgence towards non-human conscious and sensible Earthlings<br />
high enough that neither anthropochauvinists, nor old or new-speciesists<br />
cannot reach, and that, of course, immediately emphasised already known<br />
difference, made by two opposing positions within the movement for animal<br />
liberation; the one that under the mask of animal rights advocates only the<br />
regulations, making excuses that “the time isn’t right yet” or “we should be<br />
reasonable”, and the one that with its abolitionist approach demands instant<br />
and total physical, constitutional and legal emancipation of all non-humans<br />
as well as whole nations being massively killed in a silent holocaust.<br />
79