ovdje - Hrvatsko filozofsko druÅ¡tvo

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ANJA ŽIVANOVIĆ Medicinski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Srbija / Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia STAVOVI STUDENATA MEDICINE PREMA UKLJUČIVANJU VULNERABILNIH GRUPA U KLINIČKA ISPITIVANJA Uvod: Cilj našeg rada bio je ispitati stavove studenata medicine prema uključivanju vulnerabilnih subjekata u klinička ispitivanja. Materijal i metode: U studiji presjeka anketirane su dvije grupe studenata: poseban upitnik popunilo je 95 od 493 studenata III. godine (19%) i 79 od 510 studenata VI. godine (15%). Ukupno je odgovoreno na 83% postavljenih pitanja. Rezultati: U obje grupe, mali je broj ispitanika točno naveo pitanja kojima se bioetika bavi i osnovne principe bioetike. Obje grupe ispitanika uglavnom ne žele sudjelovati kao dobrovoljci u kliničkim studijama, bez značajnih razlika u ocjenjivanju mogućih motiva za uključivanje. Većina studenata smatra da medicinske probleme Roma treba rješavati kao i probleme bilo koje druge populacije. Studenti III. godine manje su spremni raditi u nehigijenskim romskim naseljima te podržavaju vakcinaciju osoblja koje tamo radi. Stavovi studenata slični su i po pitanju opravdanosti ispitivanja lijekova na djeci. Istraživanje je pokazalo da obje grupe smatraju važnim pristanak djeteta, pored pristanka njegovih roditelja, ali izraženiji stav pokazuju mlađi studenti. Kada su u pitanju ispitivanja novih lijekova na populaciji starijih dementnih pacijenata, većina ispitanika smatra da informirani pristanak treba biti sličan pristanku za bilo koju drugu populaciju. Zaključak: Potrebno je povećati interes studenata medicine za bioetiku i unaprijediti nastavu, posebno u vezi s problemima vulnerabilnih grupa. MEDICAL STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS INVOLVEMENT OF VULNERABLE GROUPS IN CLINICAL TRIALS Introduction: We aimed to assess medical students’ attitudes towards involvement of vulnerable subjects in clinical trials. 134
Material and Methods: In this cross-section study, two samples of students were questioned on selected bioethical issues: a self-completed questionnaire was delivered to 95 out of 493 students of the 3rd year (19%), and 79 out of 510 students of the 6th year (15%). Total response rate was 83%. Results: In both groups, less than 25% participants answered correctly to questions on major bioethical issues and basic principles of biomedical ethics. Both groups generally did not want to participate as volunteers in clinical trials, without significant differences in evaluating of possible motives for the participation. Majority of students thought that medical problems of Roma population should be solved as problems of any other population. Third year students were less willing to work in unhygienic Roma settlements and thought that medical staff working there should be selectively vaccinated. Attitudes of students to validity of clinical trials involving children were similar. Both groups, but especially the younger one, emphasized the importance of obtaining both child’s and parents’ consent before the trial. Regarding testing of new medicines in elderly with dementia, majority of subjects thought that informed consent should be similar to the consent for any other population. Conclusion: It is necessary to increase the interest in bioethics in medical students, and to improve bioethical education regarding problems of vulnerable groups. 135
Page 1:
ISSN 1847-8662 12. LOŠINJSKI DANI
Page 5:
SADRŽAJ / CONTENTS Organizacijski
Page 9:
ORGANIZACIJSKI ODBOR LOŠINJSKIH DA
Page 13 and 14:
Bioetika je mnogo više od nove zna
Page 15:
12. LOŠINJSKI DANI BIOETIKE Ovogod
Page 19 and 20:
NEDJELJA, 19. svibnja 2013. / SUNDA
Page 21 and 22:
11.15-11.30 LEJLA MUŠIĆ (Bosnia a
Page 23 and 24:
16.30-16.45 BRANISLAVA MEDIĆ et al
Page 25 and 26:
18.15-18.30 VELIMIR TERZIĆ et al.
Page 27 and 28:
21.00 (Hotel Aurora, Velika dvorana
Page 29 and 30:
10.15-10.45 Rasprava / Discussion 1
Page 31 and 32:
11.00-11.30 Rasprava / Discussion 1
Page 33 and 34:
21.00 (Hotel Aurora, Velika dvorana
Page 35:
sažeci izlaganja paper abstracts
Page 38 and 39:
zajedničko svim moralnim subjektim
Page 41 and 42:
Simpozij INTEGRATIVNA BIOETIKA I NO
Page 43 and 44:
ijetko tko zaista razgovara, konstr
Page 45 and 46:
postavlja se jednostavno pitanje. P
Page 47 and 48:
ostalo je izvan bioetičkih razmiš
Page 49 and 50:
Liječnik mora bolesniku izložiti
Page 51 and 52:
ALEKSANDRA DEANOSKA-TRENDAFILOVA Iu
Page 53 and 54:
života definirane na temelju krite
Page 55 and 56:
U formalnom smislu, koristi se teor
Page 57 and 58:
informed consent, we are still addr
Page 59 and 60:
na pitanja: Kakav je status starost
Page 61 and 62:
JONAS E. SALK - A PARTICIPANT IN TH
Page 63 and 64:
GHOLAMREZA HASHEMI TABAR Faculty of
Page 65 and 66:
Diagnosing the disease and applying
Page 67 and 68:
subjekt-objekt i uspostavljanjem je
Page 69 and 70:
PATIENT’S DIVERGENT PERCEPTIONS O
Page 71 and 72:
SILVANA KARAČIĆ 1 , ANA JELIČIĆ
Page 73 and 74:
BIOETHICS IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS: HUMAN
Page 75 and 76:
FOUR STEPS TO FAIR SOCIETY Pyramida
Page 77 and 78:
UNTERNEHMER - ETHIK - POLITIK In di
Page 79 and 80:
ROBERT MEĐUGORAC Zagreb, Hrvatska
Page 81 and 82:
CHOICE OF PHYSICIAN’S VOCATION FR
Page 83 and 84: LÁSZLÓ NEMES Department of Behavi
Page 85 and 86: JASMINKA PAVELIĆ Institut »Ruđer
Page 87 and 88: ALEKSANDAR RACZ, VLATKA BRUMEN, SLA
Page 89 and 90: smatraju da je Medicinski fakultet
Page 91 and 92: cinskog fakulteta. Tako je projekt
Page 93 and 94: METAPHYSICAL PRECONDITIONS OF THE I
Page 95 and 96: the ethically relevant point at whi
Page 97 and 98: One of the core courses in the thir
Page 99 and 100: Studentska bioetička radionica BIO
Page 101 and 102: of Deepwater Horizon oil spill by B
Page 103 and 104: Poseban naglasak posvećujem shvać
Page 105 and 106: EMA DRAGOJEVIĆ, EVA FELDMAN, IVA G
Page 107 and 108: SCIENCE AND POLITICS: THE AUTHORITY
Page 109 and 110: državnim institucijama i svakodnev
Page 111 and 112: EVICA JURKOVIĆ Filozofski fakultet
Page 113 and 114: BERNARD KOLUDROVIĆ Filozofski faku
Page 115 and 116: sary processes should aim at findin
Page 117 and 118: DENIS MUZIČKA, BRANIMIR KURMAIĆ F
Page 119 and 120: LUKA PERUŠIĆ Filozofski fakultet,
Page 121 and 122: ono što je, po njemu, unosilo dish
Page 123 and 124: fect of measuring environmental eff
Page 125 and 126: one koji su u mnogočemu najvulnera
Page 127 and 128: SAFET ŠAĆIROVIĆ Medicinski fakul
Page 129 and 130: KREŠIMIR VIDOVIĆ Filozofski fakul
Page 131 and 132: SARA VUKASOVIĆ Medicinski fakultet
Page 133: jednom kada je Indija ušla u zača
Page 138 and 139: No, upravo u mjeri u kojoj izražav
Page 140 and 141: PETAR FILIPIĆ Ekonomski fakultet,
Page 142 and 143: ON THE NEOLIBERAL PARADIGM AND CROA
Page 144 and 145: MARIJAN JOŠT Križevci, Hrvatska /
Page 146 and 147: ing the imposition of GMOs since th
Page 148 and 149: a spirit of selfishness, not only i
Page 151 and 152: simpozij INTEGRATIVNA BIOETIKA I NO
Page 153 and 154: Gholamreza Hashemi Tabar Ferdowsi U
Page 155 and 156: Jasminka Pavelić Institut »Ruđer
Page 157 and 158: Studentska bioetička radionica BIO
Page 159 and 160: Nino Kadić Dolčić 38 HR-10000 Za
Page 161: Safet Šaćirović Sremska 13/16 RS
Page 165: predstavljanje recentnih bioetički
Page 168 and 169: Nikolina Ćavar, Ivan Žanetić (ur
Page 170 and 171: Tomislav Krznar (ur./ed.): Čovjek
Page 172 and 173: Ksenija Turković, Sunčana Roksand
Page 175: ioetički café: bioetika i sport b
Page 178 and 179: defined set of questions on genetic
Page 181: STALNI DONATOR LOŠINJSKIH DANA BIO
show all

ovdje - Hrvatsko filozofsko druÅ¡tvo

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?