- Page 1 and 2: Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rus
- Page 3 and 4: iii Foreword Wheat is grown on roug
- Page 5 and 6: v Preface The Central and West Asia
- Page 7 and 8: vii About this publication This vol
- Page 9 and 10: ix 2nd Regional Yellow Rust Confere
- Page 11: Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rus
- Page 15 and 16: 5 Evaluation of the International W
- Page 17 and 18: 7 Azerbaijan List of Participants D
- Page 19 and 20: Mr Ehsanul Haque, CDRP, Murree Mr A
- Page 21: Mr Atif Jamal, CDRP, Murree Dr Tahi
- Page 24 and 25: 14 Nepal 297 (Karki, 1989). Severit
- Page 26 and 27: 16 Pathotypes Race analysis of yell
- Page 28 and 29: 18 Although 1 or 2 sprays of triadi
- Page 30 and 31: 20 Monitoring of the wheat yellow r
- Page 32 and 33: 22 Table 1. Yellow rust differentia
- Page 34 and 35: 24 References Afshari, F., Torabi,
- Page 36 and 37: 26 Stripe rust resistance gene Yr27
- Page 38 and 39: 28 Questions often arise as to why
- Page 40 and 41: 30 Screening of CIMMYT bread wheat
- Page 42 and 43: 32 Disease assessment and scoring o
- Page 44 and 45: 34 rust resistance. Yellow rust was
- Page 46 and 47: 36 Yellow rust virulence patterns i
- Page 48 and 49: 38 in combination or alone. Lee (Yr
- Page 50 and 51: 40 In 1995, wheat yield loss due to
- Page 52 and 53: 42 References Johnson, R., Stubbs,
- Page 54 and 55: 44 rust. Of all the wheat fields in
- Page 56 and 57: 46 Epidemiology of wheat yellow rus
- Page 58 and 59: 48 Figure 1. Disease progress curve
- Page 60 and 61: 50 Occurrence of an epidemic does n
- Page 62 and 63:
52 Identification of wheat yellow (
- Page 64 and 65:
54 differences between the controls
- Page 66 and 67:
56 References Beresford, R.M. 1982.
- Page 68 and 69:
58 Materials and methods Due to lac
- Page 70 and 71:
60 Table 2. Test differentials, res
- Page 72 and 73:
62 Table 4. Example of increased vi
- Page 74 and 75:
64 Development of molecular markers
- Page 76 and 77:
66 years. Yellow rust infection was
- Page 78 and 79:
68 Table 2. AFLP polymorphisms asso
- Page 80 and 81:
70 and genera into wheat (Knott and
- Page 82 and 83:
72 Table 2. Reaction of the lines d
- Page 84 and 85:
74 Inheritance of yellow rust resis
- Page 86 and 87:
76 Table 1. Severity and field resp
- Page 88 and 89:
78 In F 2 of cross Adir/Umanka we o
- Page 90 and 91:
80 Host-pathogen interaction Plants
- Page 92 and 93:
82 Role of protein kinase in gene-f
- Page 94 and 95:
84 approaches; and (4) provision of
- Page 96 and 97:
86 Evaluation of candidate varietie
- Page 98 and 99:
88 research, as two new categories
- Page 100 and 101:
90 Table 3B. Entries included in th
- Page 102 and 103:
92 Table 4B. Entries included in Na
- Page 104 and 105:
94 Table 6. Relative Resistance Ind
- Page 106 and 107:
96 Evaluation of International Wint
- Page 108 and 109:
98 11th FAWWON The 11th FAWWON cons
- Page 110 and 111:
100 With resistant varieties from I
- Page 112 and 113:
102 Effectiveness of yellow rust re
- Page 114 and 115:
104 infected plants according to th
- Page 116 and 117:
106 NWFP till 2001/2002. Then durin
- Page 118 and 119:
108 Table 3. Terminal reaction of d
- Page 120 and 121:
110 Eritrea, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan
- Page 122 and 123:
112 Anonymous. 2004. Travelling Whe
- Page 124 and 125:
114 considerably increased. The pea
- Page 126 and 127:
116 In the preliminary yield trial,
- Page 128 and 129:
118 In Iran, the disease is destruc
- Page 130 and 131:
120 Table 1. Evaluation of resistan
- Page 132 and 133:
122 Name Pedigree Source 49 SIBIA/M
- Page 134 and 135:
124 Name Pedigree Source 16 Altar84
- Page 136 and 137:
126 Table 4. Evaluation of resistan
- Page 138 and 139:
128 Materials and methods Commercia
- Page 140 and 141:
130 Table 1. Highest stripe rust re
- Page 143 and 144:
133 Abstracts of other papers prese
- Page 145 and 146:
135 Current and future prospects fo
- Page 147 and 148:
137 Prevalent yellow rust pathotype
- Page 149 and 150:
139 Development of wheat germplasm
- Page 151 and 152:
141 Resistance to stripe [yellow] r
- Page 153 and 154:
The study of yellow rust’s effect
- Page 155 and 156:
145 Meeting the Challenge of Yellow
- Page 157 and 158:
147 Contents List of participants i
- Page 159 and 160:
Slow-rusting resistance: a strategy
- Page 161 and 162:
Evaluation of some synthetic hexapl
- Page 163 and 164:
153 List of Participants Afghanista
- Page 165 and 166:
155 Cereal rust monitoring in Centr
- Page 167 and 168:
(Ahmed et al., 1991). Earlier, epip
- Page 169 and 170:
159 Table 1. Host differential geno
- Page 171 and 172:
161 Table 3. Commercial and elite c
- Page 173 and 174:
163 Table 5. Nile Valley and Red Se
- Page 175 and 176:
165 Table 7. Field reaction of whea
- Page 177 and 178:
167 Table 9. Yellow rust pathotypes
- Page 179 and 180:
Conclusions 169 While the diversity
- Page 181 and 182:
171 Improvement of yellow rust resi
- Page 183 and 184:
for resistance to five races of P.
- Page 185 and 186:
175 Table 2. Field responses to str
- Page 187 and 188:
PI/MZ//CNO67/3/LFN/4/ANT/5/ATTILA,
- Page 189 and 190:
References 179 Chen, X.M. 2005. Epi
- Page 191 and 192:
esistance to the yellow rust popula
- Page 193 and 194:
183 Table 2. Cross or pedigree of s
- Page 195 and 196:
185 Table 4. Disease severity and r
- Page 197 and 198:
187 Table 6A. Disease severity and
- Page 199:
Stubbs, R.W. 1988. Pathogenicity an
- Page 202 and 203:
192
- Page 204 and 205:
194 Wheat Rust in Europe Mogens S.
- Page 206 and 207:
196 Emergence of Yr27-virulences of
- Page 208 and 209:
198 An overview of wheat yellow rus
- Page 210 and 211:
200 Pathotypes and human-guided evo
- Page 212 and 213:
202 The weather conditions in April
- Page 214 and 215:
204 wheat resistance genes to yello
- Page 216 and 217:
206 sown by hand in rows 1 to 2 m l
- Page 218 and 219:
208 teamwork between pathologists a
- Page 220 and 221:
210 (Lebanon, Iran, Syria and Turke
- Page 222 and 223:
212 pathogen population being persi
- Page 224 and 225:
214 growing seasons on plants in th
- Page 226 and 227:
216 Study on distribution of and da
- Page 228 and 229:
218 Resistance of mutant winter whe
- Page 230 and 231:
220 Resistance evaluation of elite
- Page 232 and 233:
222 fields reached 30 to 50%. The a
- Page 234 and 235:
224 Wheat yellow rust establishment
- Page 236 and 237:
226 Reaction of dryland advanced wh
- Page 238 and 239:
228 reduced the harvest by an estim
- Page 240 and 241:
230 multilocational screening of jo
- Page 242 and 243:
232 Results of testing winter wheat
- Page 244 and 245:
234 Comparison of reactions of some
- Page 246 and 247:
236 Wheat seedling and adult plant
- Page 248 and 249:
238 Wheat rust surveillance A. Yahy
- Page 250 and 251:
240
- Page 252 and 253:
242 Effective and ineffective resis
- Page 254 and 255:
244 Race changes of Puccinia striif
- Page 256 and 257:
246 Influence of yellow rust on pho
- Page 258 and 259:
248 Detection and distribution of w
- Page 260 and 261:
250 Dr Mohammad Reza Jalal Kamali,
- Page 262 and 263:
252 Dr Osman Abdalla, ICARDA, Alepp
- Page 264 and 265:
254 striiformis f.sp. tritici), ste
- Page 266 and 267:
256 resistance at seedling and adul
- Page 268 and 269:
258 Figure 2. AUDPC of effective re
- Page 270 and 271:
260 ACI values for AUDPC were used
- Page 272 and 273:
262 Wheat yellow rust epidemics in
- Page 274 and 275:
264 southern part of Uzbekistan in
- Page 276 and 277:
266 Fungicides were sprayed to cont
- Page 278 and 279:
268 Introduction Yellow rust (Pucci
- Page 280 and 281:
270 Experimental yield loss estimat
- Page 282 and 283:
272 The weather was favourable from
- Page 284 and 285:
274 detected. The spread of this vi
- Page 286 and 287:
276 virulent pathotypes. Since dete
- Page 288 and 289:
278 Virulence pattern of Puccinia s
- Page 290 and 291:
280 represented different agro-ecol
- Page 292 and 293:
282 Table 1B. Wheat yellow rust sce
- Page 294 and 295:
284 Table 2. Response of tester lin
- Page 296 and 297:
286 The 3rd YRTN result revealed th
- Page 298 and 299:
288 Pathotyping of wheat stripe [ye
- Page 300 and 301:
290 against Yr7 and Yr9 were partic
- Page 302 and 303:
292 Wellings, C.R. 1986. Host : Pat
- Page 304 and 305:
294 genotypes, Shafaq 06 in 2006, a
- Page 306 and 307:
296 Results and discussion Germplas
- Page 308 and 309:
298 pathogen resistance and hence y
- Page 310 and 311:
300 References Anon[ymous]. 2009. S
- Page 312 and 313:
302 VL 738, PBW 343, PBW 396, K 060
- Page 314 and 315:
304 Results and discussion The 114
- Page 316 and 317:
306 References Anon[ymous]. 2008. A
- Page 318 and 319:
308 was also concluded that RpsEm1,
- Page 320 and 321:
310 from this study we concluded th
- Page 322 and 323:
312 References Ben Yehuda, P., Eila
- Page 324 and 325:
314 resistant despite the high susc
- Page 326 and 327:
316 The segregation ratios of the h
- Page 328 and 329:
318 Monitoring and evaluation of ye
- Page 330 and 331:
320 Bread in Tajikistan, as in othe
- Page 332 and 333:
322 Material and methods The germpl
- Page 334 and 335:
324 Table 1 presents superior varie
- Page 336 and 337:
326 Study of selected wheat genetic
- Page 338 and 339:
328 inoculum pressure. This was con
- Page 340 and 341:
330 the greenhouse. APR genes are i
- Page 342 and 343:
332 No. Genotype Gene(s) Severity a
- Page 344 and 345:
334 References Allison, C. & Isenbe
- Page 346 and 347:
336 factor is cultivation of modera
- Page 348 and 349:
338 Table 1. Yellow rust differenti
- Page 350 and 351:
340 the principal methods for ident
- Page 352 and 353:
342 Table 2. Pedigrees and names of
- Page 354 and 355:
344 Resistance response of promisin
- Page 356 and 357:
346 The seedlings were transferred
- Page 358 and 359:
348 Field assessment The results of
- Page 360 and 361:
350 Evaluation of bread and durum w
- Page 362 and 363:
352 moisture and temperature, yello
- Page 364 and 365:
354 resistance genes showed variabl
- Page 366 and 367:
356 Introduction Bread wheat in Kyr
- Page 368 and 369:
358 In 2008 we monitored the CWANA-
- Page 370 and 371:
360 Identification of wheat germpla
- Page 372 and 373:
362 Sorokina (1977). The decimal sy
- Page 374 and 375:
364 When plants of RILs were inocul
- Page 376 and 377:
366 found that the most harmful rac
- Page 378 and 379:
368
- Page 380 and 381:
370 Global cereal rust surveillance
- Page 382 and 383:
372 Trap Nurseries in epidemiology
- Page 384 and 385:
374 Changes of stripe [yellow] rust
- Page 386 and 387:
376 Adult plant resistance effectiv
- Page 388 and 389:
378 constructed for the gene using
- Page 390 and 391:
380 advance warning of locations at
- Page 392 and 393:
382 Constructing physical and genom
- Page 394 and 395:
384 only a slight differential in t
- Page 396 and 397:
386 the maintenance of genetic vari
- Page 398 and 399:
388 nurseries has decreased, while
- Page 400 and 401:
390 Breeding for qualitative resist
- Page 402 and 403:
392 Influence of yellow rust on pho
- Page 404 and 405:
394 Race composition and effective
- Page 406 and 407:
396 Breeding of winter wheat for re
- Page 408 and 409:
398 Development of wheat stripe [ye
- Page 410 and 411:
400 conditions. During this period,
- Page 412 and 413:
402 Inheritance of resistance to 4E
- Page 414 and 415:
404 trial. Yellow rust uredospores
- Page 416 and 417:
406 lines tested were severely atta
- Page 418 and 419:
408 Detection and distribution of w
- Page 420 and 421:
410 wheat varieties and hybrid line
- Page 422:
412 Artificial inoculation techniqu