19.01.2014 Views

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

140<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g and adult plant resistance to<br />

Pucc<strong>in</strong>ia striiformis f.sp. tritici <strong>in</strong> some wheat genotypes<br />

F. Afshari<br />

Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII), Karaj, Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Iran.<br />

In order to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> resistance <strong>of</strong> wheat genotypes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

adult plant stages an experiment was carried out <strong>in</strong> cropp<strong>in</strong>g season 2002/03.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage, 35 cultivars and advanced l<strong>in</strong>es were tested with a hot<br />

race <strong>of</strong> Pst 134E134A+ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> greenhouse. This pathotype has virulence on l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

with Yr2, Yr6, Yr7, Yr9 and YrA. All genotypes were <strong>in</strong>oculated with <strong>the</strong><br />

pathotype <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> greenhouse when <strong>the</strong> second leaves <strong>of</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were<br />

appear<strong>in</strong>g. After <strong>in</strong>oculation, seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were placed <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>oculation room for<br />

24 h at 10°C and 100% RH <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dark. Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>oculation, plants were<br />

moved to greenhouse chambers at 18–20°C. Infection types were recorded 15–<br />

18 days after <strong>in</strong>oculation. The aim was to record reactions when <strong>the</strong> difference<br />

between <strong>the</strong> susceptible controls and <strong>the</strong> test l<strong>in</strong>es was at a maximum. The<br />

results showed that among <strong>the</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs, 25 genotypes carried seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

resistance genes and 10 genotypes were susceptible. In <strong>the</strong> field, all 35<br />

genotypes were planted <strong>in</strong> two 1-m rows 30 cm apart under artificial<br />

<strong>in</strong>oculation with race 134E134A+. A susceptible wheat cultivar (Bolani) was<br />

planted as spreader around <strong>the</strong> field and between <strong>the</strong> rows. The response <strong>of</strong><br />

plants was evaluated us<strong>in</strong>g a modified Cobb’s scale when <strong>the</strong> flag leaf had<br />

appeared. Among <strong>the</strong>se l<strong>in</strong>es, 30 genotypes were resistant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field. All 5<br />

susceptible genotypes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage were susceptible <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field. Also,<br />

five genotypes susceptible as seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were resistant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field, which is<br />

<strong>in</strong>dication <strong>of</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> adult plant resistance gene(s) <strong>in</strong> cv. Mahdavi, S-78-11,<br />

C-78-7, N-75-16 and M-78-9 genotypes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!