19.01.2014 Views

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

274<br />

detected. The spread <strong>of</strong> this virulence reduced <strong>the</strong> large-scale cultivation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se cultivars. Subsequently, PBW 343 (Attila ) was registered as resistant to<br />

yellow rust for cultivation <strong>in</strong> 1996. This cultivar not only carried <strong>the</strong> additional<br />

gene Yr27 (Prashar et al., 2004) that protected it aga<strong>in</strong>st yellow rust but also<br />

had a yield advantage that made it popular amongst farmers <strong>of</strong> this region.<br />

Due to <strong>the</strong>se advantages, it spread very quickly, lead<strong>in</strong>g to a very strong<br />

selection pressure that led to <strong>the</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> a virulent pathotype designated<br />

as 78S84 <strong>in</strong> 2005 <strong>in</strong> Punjab (NWPZ). Gradually, this pathotype started to<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> frequency. At present, only two Yr9-virulent pathotypes are<br />

prevalent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country. The present study analyses <strong>the</strong> data <strong>of</strong> prevalence<br />

(percentage frequency) <strong>of</strong> both <strong>the</strong>se pathotypes over <strong>the</strong> yellow rust-prone<br />

zones and <strong>the</strong>ir impact on wheat production <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country. Fur<strong>the</strong>r studies on<br />

<strong>the</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> popular cultivars <strong>of</strong> this region were also conducted to<br />

identify sources <strong>of</strong> resistance.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

<strong>Rust</strong>-<strong>in</strong>fected leaves from experimental and commercial fields were collected,<br />

shade-dried and transferred to <strong>the</strong> laboratory. These leaves were <strong>the</strong>n plated<br />

on 2% water agar <strong>in</strong> Petri dishes and kept at 10°C overnight. Later, <strong>the</strong> leaves<br />

were scraped us<strong>in</strong>g a sterile lancet needle and <strong>the</strong> scrap<strong>in</strong>g was applied on<br />

one-week-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Agra Local (a local tall wheat that is be<strong>in</strong>g used as a<br />

susceptible control <strong>in</strong> India) to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>oculum. For each sample, a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

pot (11 cm diameter) <strong>of</strong> Agra Local conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 6–7 leaves was used. These<br />

<strong>in</strong>oculated seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were <strong>the</strong>n sprayed with a f<strong>in</strong>e mist <strong>of</strong> water and kept <strong>in</strong> a<br />

dew chamber overnight at 10°C. These pots were <strong>the</strong>n placed <strong>in</strong> a greenhouse<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at 16–18°C. Uredia developed on leaves <strong>of</strong> Agra Local after 12–15<br />

days. The multiplied s<strong>in</strong>gle-leaf-orig<strong>in</strong> uredospores were <strong>the</strong>n collected by<br />

shak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fected leaves over butter paper (non-hygroscopic paper). The<br />

uredospores thus collected were <strong>the</strong>n used for fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>oculation.<br />

For identify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> pathotypes, a set <strong>of</strong> 21 l<strong>in</strong>es was used, compris<strong>in</strong>g old<br />

European and World set differentials along with a few supplementary<br />

differentials (Nagarajan, Nayar and Bahadur, 1983). This <strong>in</strong>oculated set was<br />

subjected to same <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubation conditions as above. The <strong>in</strong>fection types,<br />

developed after 12–14 days, were recorded as per Stakman, Stewart and<br />

Loeger<strong>in</strong>g (1962). Infection types <strong>of</strong> 3 or 3+ were classified as susceptible, with<br />

0, 1 or 2 rated as resistant.<br />

Prevalence <strong>of</strong> a pathotype was determ<strong>in</strong>ed as percent frequency <strong>of</strong> total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> isolates analysed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year. Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> most predom<strong>in</strong>ant pathotypes, <strong>the</strong>se were <strong>the</strong>n multiplied <strong>in</strong> bulk for use<br />

<strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g adult plants. A set <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most popular 43 wheat varieties<br />

currently cultivated <strong>in</strong> different agro-climatic zones <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country was<br />

evaluated aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> most predom<strong>in</strong>ant pathotypes. For adult plant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!