19.01.2014 Views

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

components <strong>in</strong>dividually is quite laborious and time consum<strong>in</strong>g, particularly<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> trials with many entries. A convenient option is use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Area<br />

Under <strong>the</strong> Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) technique, which takes <strong>in</strong>to<br />

account all <strong>the</strong> factors collectively lead<strong>in</strong>g to manifestation <strong>of</strong> slow-rust<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a<br />

genotype. The aim <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present study was to identify slow-rust<strong>in</strong>g genotypes<br />

for stripe rust among advanced breed<strong>in</strong>g material and popular cultivars grown<br />

<strong>in</strong> different agro-climatic zones, as sources for m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

new virulence.<br />

303<br />

Materials and methods<br />

A trial with 114 wheat genotypes (37 advanced l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> T. aestivum, 5 advanced<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> T. durum, and 72 checks, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 62 T. aestivum, 9 T. durum and<br />

1 T. dicoccum) from advance varietal trial (AVT)-2nd year and 122 entries (103<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> T. aestivum, 2 l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> triticale, 15 l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> T. durum and 2 l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong><br />

T. dicoccum) from AVT-1st year were sown <strong>in</strong> as 1-m long rows with a spreader<br />

row <strong>of</strong> a susceptible check (A-9-30-1) every 20th row at Karnal dur<strong>in</strong>g crop<br />

season 2007/08. All l<strong>in</strong>es were planted as 2-m rows at 23 cm <strong>in</strong>tervals <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

2008/09 crop season. Three spreader rows (row to row gap <strong>of</strong> 15 cm) <strong>of</strong> a<br />

mixture <strong>of</strong> susceptible cultivars (A-9-30-1, Bijaga <strong>Yellow</strong>, Sonalika) were<br />

planted on <strong>the</strong> four edges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot and between <strong>the</strong> test material after every<br />

10 rows. The crop was fertilized at a rate <strong>of</strong> 120 kg N/ha (split equally between<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>g and stem elongation stages), 60 kg P/ha and 40 kg K/ha. Irrigation<br />

was provided at crown root <strong>in</strong>itiation, stem elongation, flower<strong>in</strong>g and gra<strong>in</strong><br />

formation stages <strong>of</strong> crop growth. A stripe rust epidemic was <strong>in</strong>itiated by<br />

<strong>in</strong>oculat<strong>in</strong>g 3-week-old plants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spreader rows with ured<strong>in</strong>iospore-water-<br />

Tween 20 suspension hav<strong>in</strong>g equal proportions <strong>of</strong> predom<strong>in</strong>ant stripe rust<br />

pathotypes (67S8, 47S102, 46S103, 70S69, 46S119, 78S84) collected from actively<br />

sporulat<strong>in</strong>g plants <strong>of</strong> susceptible varieties ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> isolation <strong>in</strong> a<br />

polyhouse. Hypodermic syr<strong>in</strong>ges and sprays were used to <strong>in</strong>oculate <strong>the</strong><br />

spreader rows to ensure timely establishment <strong>of</strong> stripe rust <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field. High<br />

humidity was ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed for rust development. The <strong>in</strong>fection types (Tr-R, R,<br />

Tr-MS, MS, Tr-S and S) were recorded by follow<strong>in</strong>g McNeal et al. (1971). Stripe<br />

<strong>Rust</strong> scores were recorded, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> disease severity based on <strong>the</strong><br />

modified Cobb’s scale and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection type(s) <strong>of</strong> Peterson, Campbell and<br />

Hannah (1948). The rust <strong>in</strong>tensities were recorded at 10-day <strong>in</strong>tervals and a<br />

Coefficient <strong>of</strong> Infection (CI) was calculated. AUDPC values were calculated<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g a computer package developed at CIMMYT, Mexico (CIMMYT, 1988).<br />

Wheat genotypes were grouped based on AUDPC value ranges 0, 1–100, 101–<br />

200, 201–500, 501–1000 and >1000.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!