19.01.2014 Views

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

289<br />

Materials and methods<br />

This study was carried out on Karaj station with 53 isolates <strong>of</strong> stripe rust<br />

collected from different parts <strong>of</strong> Iran. Spores <strong>of</strong> each isolate, after<br />

multiplication, were <strong>in</strong>oculated on an <strong>in</strong>ternational standard yellow rust<br />

differential set <strong>of</strong> wheat l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> greenhouse. A set <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> World (8<br />

genotypes) and European (8 genotypes) wheat yellow rust differentials, as<br />

proposed by Johnson et al. (1972), was used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study, <strong>in</strong> addition to 10<br />

supplementary genotypes, namely Federation*4/Kavkas (Yr9), Anza (YrA),<br />

Avocet R (YrA), Kalyansona (Yr2), Triticum spelta var. album (Yr5), TP 981<br />

(Yr25), Meer<strong>in</strong>g 24 (Yr24), Bolani (susceptible check), Avocet S and TP 1295.<br />

For <strong>in</strong>oculation, uredospores were mixed with talcum powder (1:4). After<br />

each <strong>in</strong>oculation, spray equipment was thoroughly washed <strong>in</strong> water and dried<br />

<strong>in</strong> an oven at 60°C to avoid contam<strong>in</strong>ation when successively <strong>in</strong>oculat<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

different pathotypes. After <strong>in</strong>oculation <strong>the</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were placed <strong>in</strong> trays and<br />

covered with plastic hoods. Trays were placed <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>cubation room at 10°C,<br />

where <strong>the</strong> differential temperatures between <strong>the</strong> water and room temperature<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> dew formation. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were held for 24 h at 10°C and 100% RH<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dark. Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cubation, plants were moved to <strong>the</strong> greenhouse and<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at 18–19°C. Infection types were recorded 16–19 days after<br />

<strong>in</strong>oculation, depend<strong>in</strong>g upon <strong>the</strong> disease and temperature. The objective was<br />

to record reactions when <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> controls and <strong>the</strong> test l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

were at <strong>the</strong>ir maximum. Infection types were recorded us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> scale (0–9)<br />

described by McNeal et al. (1971).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Stripe rust is <strong>the</strong> most serious disease <strong>of</strong> wheat <strong>in</strong> CWANA, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Iran.<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> resistant cultivars is <strong>the</strong> most effective, safe and<br />

economical method <strong>of</strong> control. However, stripe rust pathogenic variation<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>g reason for elusive rust resistance. Genetic variation <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> stripe rust pathogen is cont<strong>in</strong>uously evolv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> CWANA.<br />

In greenhouse tests, among 53 Iranian collections, 28 pathotypes were<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed (Table 1). The stripe rust population <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region consists <strong>of</strong> a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> pathotypes that differ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir pathogenicity on <strong>the</strong> host plant.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> results, virulence on plants with gene(s) Yr2, Yr6, Yr7, Yr8,<br />

Yr9, Yr24, Yr25, Yr27, YrSD, YrSP, Yr3N, Yr2+, Yr6+, Yr9+, Yr7+, Yr32+ and<br />

YrA was detected. The majority <strong>of</strong> isolates showed virulence on plant with Yr2,<br />

Yr6, Yr7, Yr9, YrA and Yr24 genes. No virulence was detected on plants with<br />

Yr1, Yr3V, Yr4, Yr5, Yr10 or YrSU. Torabi et al. (2002) noted that virulence was<br />

not detected for plant with genes Yr1, Yr4, Yr5 and Yr10, and virulence on<br />

plant with genes Yr2, Yr6, Yr7, Yr9, Yr22, Yr23 and YrA was common <strong>in</strong> Iran.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong>se virulences, pathotypes possess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> virulence

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!