19.01.2014 Views

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops - ICARDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

268<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>Yellow</strong> rust (Pucc<strong>in</strong>ia striiformis f.sp. tritici) caused substantial losses <strong>of</strong> wheat<br />

production <strong>in</strong> some major wheat grow<strong>in</strong>g areas <strong>of</strong> Morocco <strong>in</strong> 2009, due to<br />

rapid systemic <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>of</strong> affected plants result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> defoliation and shrived<br />

kernels. This is primarily a disease <strong>of</strong> cool climates. In Morocco, it had<br />

occurred <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ental areas, without caus<strong>in</strong>g major losses. However,<br />

outbreaks <strong>of</strong> yellow rust have been reported <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neighbour<strong>in</strong>g<br />

countries <strong>in</strong> western Mediterranean. Thus, serious attacks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> disease<br />

occurred <strong>in</strong> Portugal <strong>in</strong> 1957 and 1960 (Zadoks, 1965), <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1957, 1960<br />

and 1978 (Zadoks, 1965; Nagarajan et al., 1984), and <strong>in</strong> Italy, Tunisia and<br />

eastern Algeria <strong>in</strong> 1977 (Ghodbane, 1977; Vallega and Zitelli, 1979). A recent<br />

epidemic <strong>of</strong> yellow rust was reported <strong>in</strong> Algeria <strong>in</strong> 2004, but not documented.<br />

The outbreak <strong>of</strong> yellow rust could be attributed to favourable climatic<br />

conditions for disease onset and spread, to <strong>the</strong> widespread adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

susceptible cultivars and <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> virulent pathotypes (Zadoks and<br />

Bouwman, 1985). The objective <strong>of</strong> this paper is to analyse <strong>the</strong> components <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> epidemic (climate, host and pathogen) that had occurred <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

season 2008/09 <strong>in</strong> yellow rust-prone areas and to assess its impact on wheat<br />

production.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Disease survey<br />

Field trips were organized to locate yellow rust foci and to assess <strong>the</strong><br />

subsequent disease development. There were four surveys: 12–13 March, 27–28<br />

April, 15 May and 13 June. The areas surveyed were <strong>the</strong> Sais pla<strong>in</strong>s and <strong>the</strong><br />

Middle Atlas Mounta<strong>in</strong>s. Stops were made each 20 to 30 km. At each stop we<br />

recorded <strong>the</strong> location (us<strong>in</strong>g GPS), <strong>the</strong> cultivar, <strong>the</strong> growth stage and disease<br />

severity (percentage <strong>of</strong> leaf area <strong>in</strong>fected). An estimate was made each time on<br />

<strong>the</strong> potential yield and predicted yield loss.<br />

Experimental yield loss estimation<br />

A fungicide trial was conducted to determ<strong>in</strong>e potential yield loss caused by<br />

yellow rust. We compared one and two fungicide applications <strong>in</strong> addition to<br />

<strong>the</strong> control. The plot size was 50×12 m. The widely grown susceptible cv.<br />

Achtar was used. The fungicide was applied when <strong>the</strong> first yellow rust foci<br />

were observed on a neighbour<strong>in</strong>g field, and <strong>the</strong> wheat was at <strong>the</strong> two-node<br />

growth stage. Opus (epoxiconazole) was sprayed at <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> 1 L/ha on 26<br />

February 2009. The second fungicide application took place four weeks later, at<br />

head<strong>in</strong>g stage. Disease severity data were recorded each week after <strong>the</strong> first<br />

fungicide application. Yield components were determ<strong>in</strong>ed at harvest <strong>in</strong> May.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!