03.03.2014 Views

Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space

Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space

Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Chair Route: the location of the Chair route<br />

option would take the <strong>Carnival</strong> procession down the<br />

whole length of Ladbroke Grove and then turn<br />

eastwards along the Bayswater Road, with the<br />

judging point inside Hyde Park. The flow of the<br />

procession for the Chair that we were asked to assess<br />

in this report was from West to East, ending at the<br />

park. As with the other more linear routes, the Chair<br />

option would only work when combined with the<br />

implementation of a back-to-base transport system<br />

for carnivalists. This is a question of resources and<br />

logistics, but it must be resolved to avoid introducing<br />

new safety problems.<br />

Assessing the Alternatives: Compliance with Design Guidance<br />

2.72 There were variations in the compliance of each short-listed route when compared against the<br />

<strong>Carnival</strong> Route Design Guidelines. The Project found that the Horseshoe and Merging<br />

Horseshoe routes were the least compliant, whilst the Chair was most compliant with the<br />

design safety criteria. These differences are summarized below:<br />

Table 9: Summary of the alternative routes’ compliance with design guidance<br />

DESIGN GUIDANCE HORSESHOE MERGING<br />

HORSESHOE<br />

WEST-EAST ELL EAST-WEST ELL REVERSE PARK CHAIR<br />

DG1: Remove enclosure by route No No Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

DG2: Avoid pinch points No No No No No No<br />

DG3: Spread out entry and exit No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

points to encourage better crowd<br />

distribution<br />

DG4: Minimise need for vehicles to No No Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

cross route<br />

DG5: Choose permeable streets for No Ambiguous Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

entry and exit routes<br />

DG6: Minimise turns No No Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

DG7: Move judging point to quieter<br />

street or more space<br />

DG9: Put float entry and exit points<br />

away from crowded areas on route.<br />

No Yes No if five-ways<br />

No Ambiguous Yes<br />

Yes if Bishops Bridge<br />

No No Ambiguous Ambiguous Ambiguous Ambiguous<br />

2.73 Computer modelling revealed that the alternative routes differed significantly in the extent to<br />

which the crowd arrival and departure flows from the entertainment area would be forced to<br />

cross the route. The Merging Horseshoe and Horseshoe had little effect in terms of opening<br />

up the entertainment area. The “Ell” routes and the Reverse Park options opened up the<br />

<strong>Carnival</strong> area to by 22 per cent. The Chair route provided the least enclosure, with 44 to 46<br />

percent of arrival flows having direct access to the entertainment area.<br />

2.74 In terms of sheer overall capacity, the computer modelling indicated that the length of the<br />

route was a significant issue since a reduction in route length reduced the overall amount of<br />

space for spectators, the general effect being an increase in crowd density. The Horseshoe<br />

and East West Ell routes both showed poor levels of average and maximum crowding than the<br />

circular route and this result was strongly influenced by the short length of both routes. The<br />

Reverse Park and the West East Ell showed a lower average and maximum crowding than the<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!