Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space
Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space
Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Chair Route: the location of the Chair route<br />
option would take the <strong>Carnival</strong> procession down the<br />
whole length of Ladbroke Grove and then turn<br />
eastwards along the Bayswater Road, with the<br />
judging point inside Hyde Park. The flow of the<br />
procession for the Chair that we were asked to assess<br />
in this report was from West to East, ending at the<br />
park. As with the other more linear routes, the Chair<br />
option would only work when combined with the<br />
implementation of a back-to-base transport system<br />
for carnivalists. This is a question of resources and<br />
logistics, but it must be resolved to avoid introducing<br />
new safety problems.<br />
Assessing the Alternatives: Compliance with Design Guidance<br />
2.72 There were variations in the compliance of each short-listed route when compared against the<br />
<strong>Carnival</strong> Route Design Guidelines. The Project found that the Horseshoe and Merging<br />
Horseshoe routes were the least compliant, whilst the Chair was most compliant with the<br />
design safety criteria. These differences are summarized below:<br />
Table 9: Summary of the alternative routes’ compliance with design guidance<br />
DESIGN GUIDANCE HORSESHOE MERGING<br />
HORSESHOE<br />
WEST-EAST ELL EAST-WEST ELL REVERSE PARK CHAIR<br />
DG1: Remove enclosure by route No No Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />
DG2: Avoid pinch points No No No No No No<br />
DG3: Spread out entry and exit No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />
points to encourage better crowd<br />
distribution<br />
DG4: Minimise need for vehicles to No No Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />
cross route<br />
DG5: Choose permeable streets for No Ambiguous Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />
entry and exit routes<br />
DG6: Minimise turns No No Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />
DG7: Move judging point to quieter<br />
street or more space<br />
DG9: Put float entry and exit points<br />
away from crowded areas on route.<br />
No Yes No if five-ways<br />
No Ambiguous Yes<br />
Yes if Bishops Bridge<br />
No No Ambiguous Ambiguous Ambiguous Ambiguous<br />
2.73 Computer modelling revealed that the alternative routes differed significantly in the extent to<br />
which the crowd arrival and departure flows from the entertainment area would be forced to<br />
cross the route. The Merging Horseshoe and Horseshoe had little effect in terms of opening<br />
up the entertainment area. The “Ell” routes and the Reverse Park options opened up the<br />
<strong>Carnival</strong> area to by 22 per cent. The Chair route provided the least enclosure, with 44 to 46<br />
percent of arrival flows having direct access to the entertainment area.<br />
2.74 In terms of sheer overall capacity, the computer modelling indicated that the length of the<br />
route was a significant issue since a reduction in route length reduced the overall amount of<br />
space for spectators, the general effect being an increase in crowd density. The Horseshoe<br />
and East West Ell routes both showed poor levels of average and maximum crowding than the<br />
circular route and this result was strongly influenced by the short length of both routes. The<br />
Reverse Park and the West East Ell showed a lower average and maximum crowding than the<br />
105