Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space
Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space
Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• traces the cultural and historical roots of the <strong>Notting</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> <strong>Carnival</strong>, it’s multicultural and multidimensional<br />
nature, as well as the strong political and community focus that shaped its<br />
formative years;<br />
• offers a brief description of the <strong>Notting</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> <strong>Carnival</strong> as it is today, highlighting the particular<br />
changes that have taken place since 2000; and<br />
• identifies the main ‘interest groups’ within the <strong>Notting</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> <strong>Carnival</strong> – the ‘stakeholders’. The<br />
chapter also examines the relationships amongst these stakeholders and summarises their key<br />
issues and concerns.<br />
Part II: Public Safety, Responsibility and Accountability<br />
As one of the largest urban festivals in the world, attracting vast numbers of visitors onto the streets of<br />
central London, the <strong>Notting</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> <strong>Carnival</strong> poses extraordinary public safety challenges. This section:<br />
• raises questions about who is (or should be) held accountable for ensuring that public safety<br />
planning for the <strong>Carnival</strong> is effectively co-ordinated;<br />
• examines the roles and responsibilities of the various organisations and statutory agencies<br />
involved in planning and delivering the <strong>Carnival</strong>;<br />
• assesses the impact of the <strong>Carnival</strong> <strong>Review</strong> Group’s interim report and recommendations on<br />
event planning for the <strong>Carnival</strong>; and<br />
• provides an overview of the <strong>Carnival</strong> Public Safety Project, its assessment of the routes used in<br />
2001 and 2002, and its conclusions in relation to the public safety risks presented by such<br />
routes.<br />
Part III: <strong>Carnival</strong> Management and Leadership<br />
The folklore of the <strong>Notting</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> <strong>Carnival</strong> suggests that it ‘just happens’ and that it is an ‘unplanned’<br />
event. This is not however, entirely correct. The series of activities and tasks undertaken in the lead up<br />
to the August Bank Holiday weekend are the result of months of detailed planning and organising by<br />
the <strong>Carnival</strong> performers and organisers. A community-based management committee of one kind or<br />
another has, from the very outset, always overseen the <strong>Notting</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> <strong>Carnival</strong>. Over the years, these<br />
committees have been responsible for the planning and co-ordination of the event, undergoing as<br />
many transformations as the <strong>Carnival</strong> itself. This section:<br />
• charts the recent management history of the <strong>Notting</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> <strong>Carnival</strong>, from the mid-1980s to the<br />
present day. It explains the various changes in leadership that have taken place, providing the<br />
background and context to establishment of the present management, London <strong>Notting</strong> <strong>Hill</strong><br />
<strong>Carnival</strong> Ltd (LNHCL);<br />
• revisits the conclusions and recommendations of two major reports into the administration of<br />
the <strong>Carnival</strong>, the Coopers & Lybrand Report in 1988 and the end-of-funding review conducted<br />
by the Arts Council in 2001;<br />
• discusses the limitations of the community-based management, leadership and structure of<br />
successive <strong>Carnival</strong> organisations; and<br />
12